Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HIPAA HIO-201 Exam - Topic 2 Question 1 Discussion

The Privacy Rule's penalties for unauthorized disclosure:
D) Limits imprisonment to a maximum often years.
A) Imposes fines and imprisonment as civil penalties for violations.
B) Limits penalties to covered entities and their business associates.
C) Imposes criminal penalties for noncompliance with standards.
E) Is $1000 per event of disclosure.

HIPAA HIO-201 Exam - Topic 2 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for HIPAA's HIO-201 exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 2
[All HIO-201 Questions]

The Privacy Rule's penalties for unauthorized disclosure:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Marti at May 09, 2022, 07:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HIO-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Twana
10 months ago
I doubt they actually enforce the maximum ten years for imprisonment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
10 months ago
Criminal penalties are definitely a thing under the Privacy Rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
10 months ago
Wait, is it really $1000 per event? That seems low.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
10 months ago
Totally agree, it's serious business!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
11 months ago
I think the fines can really add up for violations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
11 months ago
I vaguely remember that the fines could be significant, but I thought it was more than $1000 per event.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
11 months ago
I feel like there was something about criminal penalties for serious violations, but I might be mixing it up with another regulation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
11 months ago
I remember discussing the penalties, but I'm not sure if they include imprisonment or just fines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
11 months ago
I think the penalties are specifically for covered entities and their associates, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the relationship between Credential Guard and the UEFI secure boot. I'll need to review my notes on those security features to figure out the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
11 months ago
I'm pretty sure a recursive directory listing includes the content of sub-directories, so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. ARP spoofing is the answer because it specifically tricks the switch into thinking two ports have the same MAC address. The other options don't quite fit the description in the question. I'm feeling good about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel