Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Guidewire ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts Exam - Topic 6 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Guidewire's ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 6
[All ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts Questions]

An auto accident in Chicago, Illinois has been reported to Succeed Insurance. The customer service representative uses the ClaimCenter standard Claim Wizard to set up the new claim. The policy is verified in effect and based on the reported exposures the total loss points calculated is 38. There is also a note to have an expert inspection via approved vendor.

What is the most likely claim setup with regards to this reported auto accident?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

ClaimCenter uses a logic-based process called Segmentation to categorize claims and Assignment to route them.

Complexity (Points): The 'Total Loss Points' score of 38 is significantly high. In standard configuration, high scores (typically indicating severe damage or total loss potential) trigger a High Complexity segmentation.

Assignment (Geography): The accident occurred in Chicago (Midwest). The assignment rules will match the geography (Midwest) with the complexity (High/Complex). Therefore, it routes to the Midwest Complex Auto Adjusters Group.

Workplan (Activity): The specific note regarding an 'expert inspection' translates into a generated Activity (likely 'Assign Vehicle Inspection' or similar) added to the claim's workplan.

Why other options are incorrect:

A & D (Low/Mid Complexity): A score of 38 is too high for 'Low Complexity' (which is usually for simple fender benders). Assigning a complex claim to a 'Low Complexity' group would violate standard routing logic.

C (Supervisor): Modern ClaimCenter configurations prefer Straight-Through Processing (STP) to a working group. Routing to a Supervisor is generally a fallback for exceptions, whereas this is a standard high-severity scenario that should go directly to the specialized adjusters.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Emiko
3 days ago
Wait, an expert inspection? That seems odd for a low complexity claim.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
8 days ago
I disagree, 38 loss points usually means higher complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
13 days ago
Sounds like a low complexity claim to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
18 days ago
I recall that if there's an inspection involved, it often suggests a higher complexity. So, I’m leaning towards option B or C, but I can't quite remember the exact thresholds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
24 days ago
I’m a bit confused about the segmentation. Could it be mid-complexity since they mentioned an expert inspection? That seems significant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
29 days ago
I think we practiced a similar question where the total loss points were a key factor in determining the claim's complexity. I feel like this one might lean towards high complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
1 month ago
I remember we discussed how loss points can indicate the complexity of a claim, but I'm not sure if 38 points definitely means it's high complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel