New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Professional Cloud Network Engineer Exam - Topic 5 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Network Engineer exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 5
[All Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions]

You are configuring a new HTTP application that will be exposed externally behind both IPv4 and IPv6 virtual IP addresses, using ports 80, 8080, and 443. You will have backends in two regions: us-west1 and us-east1. You want to serve the content with the lowest-possible latency while ensuring high availability and autoscaling, and create native content-based rules using the HTTP hostname and request path. The IP addresses of the clients that connect to the load balancer need to be visible to the backends. Which configuration should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Yvette
4 months ago
Just a heads up, A won't work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willis
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards D, but I’m surprised it’s not more popular.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
4 months ago
Wait, why not C? It seems like a solid option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
4 months ago
Definitely agree with D, it handles client IPs well!
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
4 months ago
I think option D is the best choice for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
5 months ago
I vaguely recall something about TCP Proxy Load Balancing, but it seems more suited for TCP traffic rather than HTTP. I think that rules out option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to consider latency and high availability. I feel like option C could work too, but I'm leaning towards D for the client IP visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the X-Forwarded-For header is important for preserving client IPs. That might point towards option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
5 months ago
I remember that for HTTP applications, External HTTP(S) Load Balancing is usually the go-to option, especially with URL Maps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
5 months ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards B - Create an Initial set of value streams that map one-to-one to existing capabilities. That seems like a logical way to start building out the value streams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with the BIG-IP device commands. I'll need to double-check the syntax for the tcpdump command to make sure I get it right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but could it be A? I vaguely recall it was related to some edge services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this one. The message is likely just a toast notification letting the user know that the file has been saved to external storage. Option D seems like the most reasonable answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
5 months ago
This seems straightforward - I'd go with option B to place the new server in the same Availability Set as the database and other app servers. That should give us the highest availability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel