New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Professional Cloud Network Engineer Exam - Topic 3 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Network Engineer exam
Question #: 102
Topic #: 3
[All Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions]

You have several VMs across multiple VPCs in your cloud environment that require access to internet endpoints. These VMs cannot have public IP addresses due to security policies, so you plan to use Cloud NAT to provide outbound internet access. Within your VPCs, you have several subnets in each region. You want to ensure that only specific subnets have access to the internet through Cloud NAT. You want to avoid any unintentional configuration issues caused by other administrators and align to Google-recommended practices. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Using an organizational policy with the restrictCloudNATUsage constraint allows you to limit Cloud NAT usage to specific subnets, ensuring that only the necessary subnets can access the internet. This method aligns with Google-recommended practices for controlling Cloud NAT configurations across multiple VPCs and regions.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Colette
3 months ago
C looks solid, but I’d double-check those priorities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julian
3 months ago
Wait, can you really restrict Cloud NAT usage like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
3 months ago
B seems like it could lead to confusion with multiple rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
4 months ago
I think D is a bit overkill for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
4 months ago
A is the best option for controlling egress!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
4 months ago
I feel like option D might be the best approach since it includes organizational policies, but I’m not entirely clear on how to implement those constraints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to set up firewall rules, but I can't recall if we needed to create multiple rules like in option B or C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
4 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I’m a bit confused about how to configure the custom source range correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
5 months ago
I remember we discussed Cloud NAT in class, but I'm not sure if we covered how to restrict access to specific subnets effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
5 months ago
Option D seems like a good way to enforce the allowed subnets using the organizational policy constraint. This could help prevent any unintentional configuration issues by other administrators. I'll need to research how to properly set up and apply the constraint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the different firewall rule options. I'll need to review the details of each approach to understand the differences and ensure I select the most appropriate solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
5 months ago
Option C looks like the best approach to me. By creating the firewall rules to deny and allow internet access based on the allowed subnets, we can ensure that only the specific subnets have access through Cloud NAT. This aligns with the Google-recommended practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the implications of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
12 months ago
I hear the correct answer is 42. Google's always got the hitchhiker's guide to the cloud, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Bernardine
11 months ago
D) Create a constraints/compute.restrictCloudNATUsage organizational policy constraint. Attach the constraint to a folder that contains the associated projects. Configure the allowedValues to only contain the subnets that should have internet access. Deploy Cloud NAT and select only the allowed subnets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
11 months ago
C) Create a firewall rule in each VPC at priority 500 that targets all instances in the network and denies egress to the internet (0.0.0.0/0). Create a firewall rule at priority 300 that targets all instances in the network, has a source filter that maps to the allowed subnets, and allows egress to the internet (0.0.0.0/0). Deploy Cloud NAT and configure a custom source range that includes the allowed subnets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
11 months ago
B) Create a firewall rule in each VPC at priority 500 that targets all instances in the network and denies egress to the internet (0.0.0.0/0). Create a firewall rule at priority 300 that targets all instances in the network, has a source filter that maps to the allowed subnets, and allows egress to the internet (0.0.0.0/0). Deploy Cloud NAT and configure all primary and secondary subnet source ranges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
11 months ago
A) Deploy Cloud NAT in each VPC and configure a custom source range that includes the allowed subnets. Configure Cloud NAT rules to only permit the allowed subnets to egress through Cloud NAT.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mickie
12 months ago
Why not just give all the VMs a shared 'Internet Superhighway' bus pass? That'll solve the security issues, right?
upvoted 0 times
Eliz
11 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
12 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isreal
1 year ago
Option A is the way to go! Who needs all those fancy firewall rules and organizational policies when you can just configure Cloud NAT directly? Keep it simple, silly!
upvoted 0 times
Angella
11 months ago
Yeah, I prefer keeping things simple too. Option A is definitely the way to go in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
11 months ago
I agree, simplicity is key. Option A seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Buck
1 year ago
I'm not sure about option A. I think option D might be a better approach by using organizational policy constraints to restrict Cloud NAT usage to specific subnets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
1 year ago
I agree with Ligia. Option A seems to align with Google-recommended practices and minimizes the risk of unintentional configuration issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
1 year ago
Option B seems a bit overkill with all those firewall rules. I'd stick with option C - nice and clean.
upvoted 0 times
Teresita
12 months ago
I think I'll go with option C as well, thanks for the input!
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
12 months ago
Option C does provide a clear way to ensure only specific subnets have internet access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
12 months ago
Yeah, option B does seem a bit complicated with all those firewall rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
12 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ligia
1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice. It allows us to configure Cloud NAT in each VPC with custom source ranges for specific subnets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
1 year ago
I'd go with option D. Using the organizational policy constraint is a great way to enforce the allowed subnets and prevent any configuration drift.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
1 year ago
Option C looks good to me. Keeping the firewall rules simple and leveraging Cloud NAT's custom source range seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Leonor
11 months ago
User 4: Definitely, following Google-recommended practices is key to ensuring a secure and efficient cloud environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
11 months ago
User 3: Yeah, having specific rules for the allowed subnets makes it easier to manage and maintain security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
12 months ago
User 2: I agree, it's important to have a clear configuration to avoid any unintentional issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
12 months ago
User 1: Option C looks good to me. Keeping the firewall rules simple and leveraging Cloud NAT's custom source range seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel