Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Exam - Topic 4 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 4
[All Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Questions]

[Building and implementing CI/CD pipelines for a service]

You work for a company that manages highly sensitive user dat

a. You are designing the Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) infrastructure for your company, including several applications that will be deployed in development and production environments. Your design must protect data from unauthorized access from other applications while minimizing the amount of management overhead required. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Eliseo at Nov 22, 2025, 12:43 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jacqueline
7 days ago
Option B gives more control. Better to be safe with sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
12 days ago
I worry about option A. What if one namespace gets compromised?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
17 days ago
I’m leaning towards option C. Fewer clusters mean less management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
22 days ago
Option D sounds good too. Isolating apps is crucial for sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
27 days ago
I prefer option B. Separate clusters for environments feel safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
1 month ago
I think option A is the best. It keeps things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrie
1 month ago
I think B is the best choice for clear separation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
2 months ago
C is a good balance, but I worry about security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
2 months ago
I’m surprised that D is even an option! Too many clusters!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emogene
2 months ago
I disagree, A is more efficient with management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
2 months ago
Option B seems the safest for sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
3 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of cluster design. I say we just put everything in one cluster and see what happens. What could go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
3 months ago
B) is the clear winner here. Gotta keep those dev and prod environments separate, you know? Security first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
3 months ago
D) sounds like a nightmare to manage. One cluster per app? No thanks, I'll pass on that headache.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
3 months ago
I feel like option D might be overkill with too many clusters, but I do see the benefit of isolating applications completely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
3 months ago
I think I practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that using separate namespaces can help with security, but I can't remember if one cluster is enough for everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
3 months ago
Separating environments is important for security, but managing multiple clusters could get complicated. I'm going to carefully consider the pros and cons of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
4 months ago
This is a good opportunity to demonstrate my understanding of Kubernetes best practices. I'm pretty confident option B is the way to go, but I'll review the other choices just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording here. Can we have multiple clusters in the same organization? I want to make sure I understand the constraints before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
4 months ago
I'd go with C). Fewer clusters to manage, and namespaces can handle the isolation. Plus, who needs more than one cluster, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
4 months ago
B) is the way to go. Separate clusters for dev and prod, with each app in its own namespace. Keeps things nice and tidy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
4 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of isolating environments, so option B seems like a good choice, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the most efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgilio
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A since it minimizes management overhead, but I worry about the security implications of having everything in one cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key is balancing security and maintainability. I'm leaning towards option B, but I'll need to double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the trade-offs between data isolation, management overhead, and cluster complexity.
upvoted 0 times
Frank
2 days ago
True, but it might increase management overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
5 months ago
I think option B makes sense. Separate clusters for each environment can enhance security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel