New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Exam - Topic 3 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 3
[All Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Questions]

Your company operates in a highly regulated domain. Your security team requires that only trusted container images can be deployed to Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE). You need to implement a solution that meets the requirements of the security team, while minimizing management overhead. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Talia at Mar 21, 2024, 11:06 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lizette
3 months ago
Surprised that people aren't mentioning the management overhead with Cloud Run!
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
3 months ago
I think granting roles to the service account is too risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
4 months ago
Wait, isn't Kritis also a good option? Why not consider that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
4 months ago
I agree, Binary Authorization is a solid way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maricela
4 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice for enforcing security policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
4 months ago
I recall that using Cloud Run for custom validators could add unnecessary complexity. It might not minimize management overhead as required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
4 months ago
I feel like granting roles to the Cloud Build service account could lead to some security risks if not managed properly. Not sure if that's the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think Kritis was mentioned in a practice question about image validation. It might be relevant here too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
5 months ago
I remember studying about Binary Authorization and how it helps enforce security policies at deployment time. It seems like a good fit for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Option D, configuring Binary Authorization, seems like the best fit. It provides the security controls we need without a lot of extra management overhead. I'd go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. I think the Binary Authorization approach in option D sounds promising - it allows me to enforce security policies at deploy time, which should meet the security team's needs. And it seems like it would be relatively low-maintenance compared to a custom validation solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the options here. It's not entirely clear to me how each approach would work in practice. I might need to do some additional research to fully understand the tradeoffs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about securing container deployments in a regulated environment. I think the key is to find a solution that minimizes management overhead while still meeting the security team's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key is to identify the technology the application is built on, verify the match rules, and check the interactions between applications. Those seem like the most important discovery steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
5 months ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. The key is understanding how the integration configuration is handled during the synchronization between the primary and secondary FMCs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I'll need to think through the different scenarios and configurations to figure out the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
5 months ago
Ensuring all the actions are contained in a single Object seems like a smart way to optimize the code. I'll definitely consider that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
5 months ago
I think the feature is called FlightPath, but I'm not 100% sure. I remember something about it being the way to visualize connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
2 years ago
But with Binary Authorization, we can ensure only trusted container images are deployed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
2 years ago
I'm not sure. Option C with Kritis also seems like a valid solution to enforce security policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
2 years ago
I agree with Hoa. Option D with Binary Authorization seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
2 years ago
I think option D sounds like a good choice. It enforces security policies at deploy time.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
2 years ago
I see your point, Josephine, but Binary Authorization directly enforces the policies at deploy-time, which may be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
2 years ago
I'm not sure, wouldn't configuring Kritis in our GKE clusters also help enforce deploy-time security policies?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
2 years ago
I agree with My, Binary Authorization seems like the best way to ensure only trusted container images are deployed.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
2 years ago
I think we should go with option D), configure Binary Authorization in our GKE clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
2 years ago
Option C with Kritis is also an interesting option. It lets us define custom security policies and apply them to our deployments. But it might be a bit more complex to set up and maintain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
2 years ago
Yeah, Binary Authorization seems like the most straightforward solution. We don't have to worry about managing additional services or permissions. It just handles the policy enforcement for us.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
2 years ago
Haha, yeah, the less we have to manage, the better. I'm all about that low-maintenance approach. Binary Authorization is sounding better and better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
2 years ago
True, Kritis could be a bit more hands-on. Plus, I'm a little worried about the management overhead with a custom validator in Option B. Gotta keep that overhead to a minimum, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Kenda
2 years ago
C) Configure Kritis to run in your GKE clusters to enforce deploy-time security policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
2 years ago
D) Configure Binary Authorization in your GKE clusters to enforce deploy-time security policies
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
2 years ago
A) Grant the roles/artifactregistry. writer role to the Cloud Build service account. Confirm that no employee has Artifact Registry write permission.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
2 years ago
D) Configure Binary Authorization in your GKE clusters to enforce deploy-time security policies
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel