Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Professional Cloud Developer Exam - Topic 2 Question 63 Discussion

You have a container deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine. The container can sometimes be slow to launch, so you have implemented a liveness probe. You notice that the liveness probe occasionally fails on launch. What should you do?
B) Increase the initial delay for the liveness probe.
A) Add a startup probe.
C) Increase the CPU limit for the container.
D) Add a readiness probe.

Google Professional Cloud Developer Exam - Topic 2 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Developer exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 2
[All Professional Cloud Developer Questions]

You have a container deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine. The container can sometimes be slow to launch, so you have implemented a liveness probe. You notice that the liveness probe occasionally fails on launch. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-liveness-readiness-startup-probes/#configure-probes


by Youlanda at Jan 07, 2023, 12:16 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Professional Cloud Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Estrella
10 months ago
Readiness probes are useful, but not the right fix here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
10 months ago
Definitely A! Surprised it’s not the first option everyone picks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
10 months ago
Not sure about C, increasing CPU might not fix the probe issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
11 months ago
I think increasing the initial delay for the liveness probe makes sense too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latonia
11 months ago
A startup probe would help with slow launches!
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
11 months ago
Increasing the CPU limit seems like it could help with performance, but I’m not convinced that’s the best solution for a liveness probe failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
11 months ago
I practiced a question like this, and I think adding a readiness probe is more about traffic management, not really for startup issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
11 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think increasing the initial delay for the liveness probe could help if the container is just slow to start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
11 months ago
I remember something about startup probes being useful for containers that take longer to initialize. That might be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. The Reach column seems like the most logical place, but I want to double-check the other options just to be sure. I don't want to rush into an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
11 months ago
I'm a little confused. Wouldn't this just apply the policy to all users, including the temporary employees? I'm not sure if that's the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
11 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The question is clearly asking about what the chief audit executive should disclose, so I think the answer is going to be something related to the quality assessment process itself. I'm going to go with option D - the qualifications and independence of the assessment team seem like the most relevant information to share.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tora
11 months ago
Ah, I think I've got it. The S.M.A.R.T. error is just a warning that the drive might fail in the future, but it doesn't mean the drive is actually failing right now. That makes sense, so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel