Google Professional Cloud Developer Exam - Topic 1 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Developer exam

Question #: 82
Topic #: 1

[All Professional Cloud Developer Questions]

You manage an application that runs in a Compute Engine instance. You also have multiple backend services executing in stand-alone Docker containers running in Compute Engine instances. The Compute Engine instances supporting the backend services are scaled by managed instance groups in multiple regions. You want your calling application to be loosely coupled. You need to be able to invoke distinct service implementations that are chosen based on the value of an HTTP header found in the request. Which Google Cloud feature should you use to invoke the backend services?

ATraffic Director

BService Directory

CAnthos Service Mesh

DInternal HTTP(S) Load Balancing

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Cordie at May 10, 2024, 12:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Professional Cloud Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jacklyn

3 months ago

I’m surprised this isn’t a trick question!

upvoted 0 times

...

Phuong

3 months ago

Internal HTTP(S) Load Balancing could work, but it’s not as flexible.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clay

3 months ago

Wait, are you sure? I thought Service Directory might fit too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alpha

4 months ago

Totally agree, Traffic Director is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Dick

4 months ago

I think the answer is A, Traffic Director. It handles traffic routing based on headers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rozella

4 months ago

Service Directory sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it directly helps with invoking services based on HTTP headers. I feel like I need to review that concept again.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharita

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question about service invocation, and I think Anthos Service Mesh might be relevant, especially for managing microservices, but I'm not confident about the specifics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

4 months ago

I think Internal HTTP(S) Load Balancing could work here since it can route traffic based on headers, but I need to double-check if it supports the level of granularity we need.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melvin

5 months ago

I remember studying about Traffic Director and how it helps with service discovery and traffic management, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best fit for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Angelica

5 months ago

This is a tough one, but I think I've got a strategy. I'm going to carefully read through the requirements again and try to match them up with the features of each option. That should help me narrow it down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Minna

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident that the answer is Internal HTTP(S) Load Balancing. It can handle the dynamic scaling of the backend services and the routing based on the HTTP header seems like a good fit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hayley

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is that we need to be able to invoke different service implementations based on an HTTP header. That sounds like a job for Anthos Service Mesh, which can handle advanced routing and traffic management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Providencia

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the loose coupling requirement. I'm leaning towards Traffic Director since it can handle dynamic service discovery and load balancing, but I'm not sure if that's the best fit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cammy

5 months ago

This looks like a tricky one. I'm not sure if I fully understand the requirements, but I think Service Directory might be the way to go since it allows for service discovery and routing based on metadata.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenn

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. The question mentions interface protocol policies, but the answer choices don't seem to directly match that. I'll need to review the ACI object types and how they relate to interface policies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marquetta

5 months ago

Ah, I know this one! Successful partnerships require complementary strengths, a common customer base, and good chemistry between the partners. I'm pretty sure the answer is D, "All of the above."

upvoted 0 times

...

In

9 months ago

Service Directory for sure! It's the perfect solution for this use case. Plus, it's just fun to say 'Service Directory' - it's like a superhero name for your APIs!

upvoted 0 times

Johnetta

8 months ago

True, Traffic Director is another good option for invoking backend services based on HTTP headers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimbery

8 months ago

I think Traffic Director could also work well for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lemuel

8 months ago

I agree, Service Directory makes it easy to invoke different service implementations based on HTTP headers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Torie

8 months ago

Service Directory is definitely the way to go. It's like having a superhero for your APIs!

upvoted 0 times

...

Rikki

10 months ago

Internal HTTP(S) Load Balancing could work, but it doesn't really address the dynamic service selection based on the HTTP header. I'd say Service Directory is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Lon

9 months ago

C) Anthos Service Mesh

upvoted 0 times

...

Izetta

9 months ago

B) Service Directory

upvoted 0 times

...

Cammy

9 months ago

A) Traffic Director

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebbecca

10 months ago

Why do you think that? I thought Traffic Director would be the best choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hayley

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. Anthos Service Mesh also seems like a good choice for managing and routing traffic to the backend services. But Service Directory might be the simpler solution here.

upvoted 0 times

Mitzie

10 months ago

Service Directory might be a simpler solution for invoking distinct service implementations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marvel

10 months ago

I think Anthos Service Mesh could be a good option for managing traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mary

11 months ago

I think I'd go with Service Directory. It seems like the best option to decouple the calling application from the backend services and allow for dynamic service discovery based on the HTTP header.

upvoted 0 times