New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Professional Cloud Architect Exam - Topic 6 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Architect exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 6
[All Professional Cloud Architect Questions]

The current Dress4win system architecture has high latency to some customers because it is located in one

data center.

As of a future evaluation and optimizing for performance in the cloud, Dresss4win wants to distribute it's system

architecture to multiple locations when Google cloud platform.

Which approach should they use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/multi-cluster-ingress#how_works

https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/k8s-multicluster-ingress

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/gcp/how-to-deploy-geographically-distributed-services-on-kubernetes-engine-with-kubemci


by Margurite at Sep 17, 2024, 07:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Professional Cloud Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Katie
3 months ago
Can we really trust a global load balancer to handle all that traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
3 months ago
Wow, I didn't realize latency could be so high with just one data center!
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
3 months ago
Not sure about B, seems less efficient to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
I agree, regional managed instance groups are key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
4 months ago
A sounds like the best option for performance!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
4 months ago
I feel like option C is more about reliability than performance, but I could be wrong. I need to double-check the benefits of failover in different regions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between options B and D. Both mention global load balancers, but I can't recall which one is better for performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
4 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar from practice questions, where regional managed instance groups were emphasized for scaling based on traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
5 months ago
I remember studying about managed instance groups, but I'm not sure if they really help with latency or just reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
5 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'm leaning towards option A - using regional managed instance groups and a global load balancer. That way the instances can scale independently in each region to handle the traffic, which should improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. The question is asking about how to distribute the system, so I'll want to look at the options that involve multiple locations, like A and C. Then I'll need to evaluate which one best addresses the performance and reliability requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. It mentions "regional managed instance groups" and "global load balancers" - I'll need to make sure I understand those concepts before attempting to answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
5 months ago
This looks like a classic cloud architecture optimization question. I think the key is to focus on how to distribute the system across multiple locations to improve performance and reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about how to save that manager email data so I can access it later.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
9 months ago
As a wise person once said, 'The cloud is just someone else's computer.' So really, any of these options will work as long as you remember to pay your monthly cloud bill on time!
upvoted 0 times
Regenia
8 months ago
As long as we pay our cloud bill on time, we should be good to go with any of these options!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
9 months ago
C) Use regional managed instance groups and a global load balancer to increase reliability by providing automatic failover between zones in different regions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
9 months ago
A) Use regional managed instance groups and a global load balancer to increase performance because the regional managed instance group can grow instances in each region separately based on traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
King
10 months ago
Option D is definitely the way to go! I mean, who doesn't love a good 'set of virtual machines that forward the requests to a closer group of virtual machines'? It's like a virtual Russian nesting doll for your infrastructure!
upvoted 0 times
Marti
9 months ago
I agree, Option D sounds like a solid choice for optimizing performance in the cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
9 months ago
It's like a virtual Russian nesting doll for your infrastructure!
upvoted 0 times
...
German
9 months ago
Option D is definitely the way to go! I mean, who doesn't love a good 'set of virtual machines that forward the requests to a closer group of virtual machines'?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashanti
10 months ago
I don't know, Option B sounds a bit convoluted to me. Why not just use a global load balancer and managed instance groups like in Option A? Seems simpler and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Vince
8 months ago
That's a good point. Option A does seem like the most reliable choice for Dress4win's system architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
8 months ago
True, but Option A offers automatic failover between zones in different regions for increased reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
8 months ago
But Option B could also work if you have a strong operations team to manage the virtual machines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
9 months ago
I think Option A is the best choice. It's simpler and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vivan
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Automatic failover between zones in different regions sounds like a great way to increase reliability, which is important for a system like Dress4win.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
10 months ago
But wouldn't using a global load balancer with virtual machines managed by the operations team also be a good option for optimizing performance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
10 months ago
I agree with Kris, regional managed instance groups can help grow instances based on traffic in each region separately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
10 months ago
I think Dress4win should use regional managed instance groups and a global load balancer for increased performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
11 months ago
Option A seems like the best approach. Regional managed instance groups can scale instances in each region based on traffic, which should improve performance for customers in different locations.
upvoted 0 times
Chau
9 months ago
User 4: Definitely, that would improve the experience for customers in different locations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
9 months ago
User 3: It makes sense to scale instances based on traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Essie
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, regional managed instance groups can help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
10 months ago
User 1: I think Option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel