Google Exam Professional Cloud Architect Topic 5 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Architect exam

Question #: 98
Topic #: 5

[All Professional Cloud Architect Questions]

For this question, refer to the Mountkirk Games case study. You need to analyze and define the technical architecture for the compute workloads for your company, Mountkirk Games. Considering the Mountkirk Games business and technical requirements, what should you do?

ACreate network load balancers. Use preemptible Compute Engine instances.

BCreate network load balancers. Use non-preemptible Compute Engine instances.

CCreate a global load balancer with managed instance groups and autoscaling policies. Use preemptible Compute Engine instances.

DCreate a global load balancer with managed instance groups and autoscaling policies. Use non-preemptible Compute Engine instances.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/nodes/provisioning-sole-tenant-vms#provision_a_sole-tenant_vm

https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/nodes/provisioning-sole-tenant-vms#gcloud_2

When you create a VM, you request sole-tenancy by specifying node affinity or anti-affinity, referencing one or more node affinity labels. You specify custom node affinity labels when you create a node template, and Compute Engine automatically includes some default affinity labels on each node. By specifying affinity when you create a VM, you can schedule VMs together on a specific node or nodes in a node group. By specifying anti-affinity when you create a VM, you can ensure that certain VMs are not scheduled together on the same node or nodes in a node group.

by Alishia at Nov 16, 2024, 06:04 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Professional Cloud Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Mitsue

22 days ago

Option C all the way! Preemptible instances, you say? I bet the Mountkirk developers can code a few extra lives into the game. What could possibly go wrong?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosendo

23 days ago

Ah, the age-old debate: cost-saving preemptible instances or reliable non-preemptible ones? I say, why not both? Let's spin up a few of each and see which one survives the epic boss battle!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lura

24 days ago

Hmm, preemptible instances? That's a bold move. I hope they don't randomly disappear in the middle of a game session! Option C could work, but I'd be a bit nervous about it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erinn

25 days ago

I'm not sure about preemptible instances for a gaming company. Reliability might be a concern, so I'd lean towards Option D to ensure a more stable infrastructure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tammi

1 months ago

Option C seems to be the best choice here. Using preemptible instances with a global load balancer and autoscaling policies should provide the scalability and cost-effectiveness that Mountkirk Games needs.

upvoted 0 times