Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Exam Professional Cloud Architect Topic 2 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Architect exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 2
[All Professional Cloud Architect Questions]

For this question, refer to the Dress4Win case study.

As part of their new application experience, Dress4Wm allows customers to upload images of themselves. The customer has exclusive control over who may view these images. Customers should be able to upload images with minimal latency and also be shown their images quickly on the main application page when they log in. Which configuration should Dress4Win use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/standard/go/how-requests-are-handled

by Man at Mar 23, 2025, 05:53 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Professional Cloud Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Yvette
2 months ago
Hold up, Option D with the distributed file system and Cloud SQL sounds like a real fashion show backstage. Gotta have that database to keep track of all the image divas, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Kip
20 days ago
D) Use a distributed file system to store customers' images. As storage needs increase, add more persistent disks and/or nodes. Use a Google Cloud SQL database to maintain metadata that maps each customer's ID to their image files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
21 days ago
B) Store image files in a Google Cloud Storage bucket. Add custom metadata to the uploaded images in Cloud Storage that contains the customer's unique ID.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
1 months ago
A) Store image files in a Google Cloud Storage bucket. Use Google Cloud Datastore to maintain metadata that maps each customer's ID and their image files.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willow
3 months ago
Option B all the way! Cloud Storage is like a digital closet for your customers' fashion pics. And the custom metadata is the stylish little tag that keeps track of who owns what. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Yuette
1 months ago
Definitely! Using Cloud Storage with custom metadata is a smart way to handle the image uploads. It's a win-win for both the customers and Dress4Win.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
1 months ago
I agree! Option B sounds like the best choice for Dress4Win. It's efficient and ensures privacy for the customers' images.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
2 months ago
Option B all the way! Cloud Storage is like a digital closet for your customers' fashion pics. And the custom metadata is the stylish little tag that keeps track of who owns what. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosendo
3 months ago
I don't know, Option A with the Cloud Storage and Datastore combo seems a bit overkill. Why not just use the Cloud Storage bucket with the custom metadata? That seems like the simplest and most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
Kristofer
2 months ago
Yeah, Option B with custom metadata in Cloud Storage sounds like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
2 months ago
I agree, Option B seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
2 months ago
Option B sounds like the best choice. It's simple and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nelida
3 months ago
Hmm, Option C with the file system and owner attributes is an interesting idea. It's a bit more complex than the other options, but it could provide good privacy and control for the customers. Definitely worth considering.
upvoted 0 times
Gilma
2 months ago
That's true, it would be a simpler option but still effective for managing the images.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
2 months ago
I think using Google Cloud Storage with custom metadata could also work well for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
3 months ago
I agree, it might be a bit more complex but it could be worth it for the added control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
3 months ago
Option C with the file system and owner attributes sounds like a good choice for privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geraldine
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. Using a distributed file system for the images and a Cloud SQL database for the metadata sounds like a more scalable and robust solution. The database will make it easier to manage and query the image data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
3 months ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward approach. Storing the images in a Cloud Storage bucket and adding custom metadata with the customer's ID is a simple and effective way to maintain control and privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
3 months ago
That's a good point, Kiley. Scalability is important for a growing application like Dress4Win. Option C does seem like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C would be better. Using a distributed file system can provide scalability as storage needs increase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
3 months ago
I think Dress4Win should use option A. It seems like a simple and efficient way to store and manage the images.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel