Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Chrome-Enterprise-Administrator Topic 1 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Chrome-Enterprise-Administrator exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 1
[All Chrome-Enterprise-Administrator Questions]

[Chrome Extensions]

Company A uses an extension that is critical to business operations The company currently pins the version of the extension They received an updated version of the extension that delivers new functionality The Chrome administrator notices that the new version now requests all available permissions, while the previous version only requested four permissions

Which action should the Chrome administrator recommend to address this security issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Veda
1 months ago
Hold up, did someone say 'risky websites'? I'm pretty sure the Chrome admin isn't moonlighting as the internet police. Let's stick to the professional options here, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
1 months ago
Option B? Really? Who wants to block a critical business tool? That's just asking for trouble. I'll take the version pinning, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevive
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure I'd want to block the extension entirely. That could really mess things up. Option D seems like the most prudent choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Dulce
20 days ago
User 3: Yeah, it's better to be safe and get more details before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
27 days ago
User 2: Ilene is right, we should probably stick with option D and contact the developer for more information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
28 days ago
User 1: I agree, blocking the extension completely could cause more issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michal
1 months ago
I think we should continue using version pinning until we can get more information from the developer. We need to know why the permissions changed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
1 months ago
I think we should customize the permissions to match the previous version. It might be a hassle, but it's worth it for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
2 months ago
I agree with Micheline. It's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
2 months ago
I think we should block the extension until a new version with fewer permissions is available.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
2 months ago
Personally, I'd go with option C. Customizing the permissions to match the previous version seems like the smartest move. Keeps things secure without disrupting business operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
3 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Staying with the previous version until you get more information from the developer is the safest bet. No need to take unnecessary risks here.
upvoted 0 times
Nu
1 months ago
User 3: I think it's better to be cautious and wait for more information before updating.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, we shouldn't risk using the new version without knowing more about the changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, sticking with the old version seems like the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel