Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Associate Google Workspace Administrator Exam - Topic 2 Question 21 Discussion

Posted by Vanda on May 07, 2026 at 05:32 PM

The human resources department notified you of a legal investigation that was started for an employee in the finance department. You need to ensure that this employee's Google Drive data is preserved for at least one year and does not get deleted by the user or by other means. The Google Vault default retention rules for Drive are set for five years. What should you do?

Suggested Answer: C

When there's a legal investigation, the priority is to ensure that relevant data is preserved and not deleted, regardless of retention policies or user actions. A 'hold' (also known as a litigation hold or legal hold) in Google Vault is specifically designed for this purpose. It overrides all retention rules (both default and custom) and prevents any data covered by the hold from being purged, even if a user attempts to delete it.

Here's why the other options are not the correct or best solution:

A . Change the Vault default retention rule to one year instead of five. Changing the default retention rule would affect all Drive data in your organization, not just this specific employee's. It's a broad change and not suitable for a targeted legal hold. Moreover, it wouldn't guarantee preservation against user deletions.

B . Place the employee into a separate organizational unit (OU). Create a custom one-year retention rule for this OU. While creating custom retention rules for OUs is possible, it's not the primary mechanism for a legal hold. Retention rules define when data can be deleted, but a hold prevents deletion irrespective of the retention period. If the employee deletes the data, a retention rule won't stop it from moving to trash (and eventually being purged) unless a hold is in place. Furthermore, a one-year retention rule isn't the goal; the goal is to preserve for 'at least one year' (meaning indefinitely until the hold is released). The default five-year rule is already longer than one year, but doesn't override user deletion.

D . Confirm that the Vault default retention rule is set for five years. The question states that the default retention rule for Drive is already set for five years. While this is good for general data retention, it does not prevent a user from deleting their own files from Drive, nor does it specifically address the need for a legal hold where data must be absolutely preserved. A default retention rule does not override user deletion or ensure data preservation for legal purposes.

Reference from Google Workspace Administrator:

Holds in Google Vault: This is the core concept. Holds prevent data from being purged from Google systems, regardless of retention rules or user actions, until the hold is released. They are specifically used for legal discovery or investigation purposes.


Retention rules in Google Vault: While relevant to data management, retention rules define when data can be deleted if no hold applies. They do not prevent users from deleting data or ensure preservation for legal holds.

Get Premium Associate Google Workspace Administrator Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
CA
Carli 2 days ago
It customizes retention for that employee.
LO
Lorean 8 days ago
Why B?
CA
Carli 13 days ago
This is tricky. I think option B is best.
RO
Ronald 18 days ago
Let's go with Option C then!
LA
Launa 23 days ago
Yes, compliance is key here.
MO
Mozell 28 days ago
Better safe than sorry, right?
SH
Shizue 1 month ago
Still, I worry about the implications of a hold.
RO
Ronald 1 month ago
I feel confident about that choice.
LA
Launa 1 month ago
Exactly! Option C is the safest bet.
MO
Mozell 2 months ago
A hold in Vault guarantees preservation.
SH
Shizue 2 months ago
But what if the OU settings mess up?
RO
Ronald 2 months ago
Custom rules are safer. Option B is solid.
LA
Launa 2 months ago
True, but we need to comply with the investigation.
MO
Mozell 2 months ago
Changing to one year could risk losing data.
SH
Shizue 2 months ago
Why not just change the retention rule?
RO
Ronald 3 months ago
I agree. Option C seems best.
LA
Launa 3 months ago
This is tricky. I feel like we need to ensure data is safe.
VE
Veronika 3 months ago
Five years seems excessive for just one employee, right?
NE
Nelida 3 months ago
Definitely agree with C, holds are crucial in legal cases.
ST
Stevie 3 months ago
Why would we change the default to one year? That seems risky.
AS
Ashleigh 4 months ago
I think C is the safest way to ensure data is preserved.
KA
Kayleigh 4 months ago
Option B is the best choice for custom retention.
LO
Louvenia 4 months ago
I feel like confirming the default retention rule is important, but it seems like we need to take action beyond just checking that it's set for five years.
RI
Rickie 5 months ago
Placing the employee in a separate OU sounds familiar, but I wonder if creating a custom retention rule is really necessary if we can just put a hold in place.
CA
Carmen 6 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to adjust retention rules, but I can't recall if changing the default rule is the best option here.
DE
Desire 6 months ago
I think we might need to create a hold in Vault for the employee's Drive data, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only step we need to take.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel