Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Associate Cloud Engineer Exam - Topic 8 Question 17 Discussion

Your company uses a large number of Google Cloud services centralized in a single project. All teams have specific projects for testing and development. The DevOps team needs access to all of the production services in order to perform their job. You want to prevent Google Cloud product changes from broadening their permissions in the future. You want to follow Google-recommended practices. What should you do?
A) Grant all members of the DevOps team the role of Project Editor on the organization level.
B) Grant all members of the DevOps team the role of Project Editor on the production project.
C) Create a custom role that combines the required permissions. Grant the DevOps team the custom role on the production project.
D) Create a custom role that combines the required permissions. Grant the DevOps team the custom role on the organization level.

Google Associate Cloud Engineer Exam - Topic 8 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Associate Cloud Engineer exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 8
[All Associate Cloud Engineer Questions]

Your company uses a large number of Google Cloud services centralized in a single project. All teams have specific projects for testing and development. The DevOps team needs access to all of the production services in order to perform their job. You want to prevent Google Cloud product changes from broadening their permissions in the future. You want to follow Google-recommended practices. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Ilene at May 08, 2022, 12:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Associate Cloud Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lelia
9 months ago
I'm surprised this is even a question—custom roles are so much safer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
9 months ago
Definitely not A or D, those could lead to too many permissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
9 months ago
Wait, why not just give them Project Editor access?
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
9 months ago
Totally agree, custom roles are the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
9 months ago
Option C seems like the best choice for limiting permissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
10 months ago
I wonder if creating a custom role at the organization level could lead to complications later. It seems safer to do it just for the production project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
10 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to limit permissions. Creating a custom role sounds like the best option to avoid future permission issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
10 months ago
I think granting the DevOps team Project Editor on the organization level could be too broad and might give them more access than needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like granting Project Editor on the production project might still leave room for unwanted changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
10 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question on network security measures. I'll start by carefully reading through the options and thinking about which one best matches the description in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
10 months ago
Okay, this seems straightforward. I'll just need to calculate the total voltage of the battery based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
10 months ago
I think Power Automate is the way to go here. It's designed for automating workflows and integrating different systems, so it should be able to create the Outlook tasks we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
10 months ago
I feel like this question relates to another practice question we had on bridge pools. Maybe option B is the right answer?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel