New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Cloud - Apigee Certified API Engineer Exam - Topic 11 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Google Cloud - Apigee Certified API Engineer exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 11
[All Google Cloud - Apigee Certified API Engineer Questions]

You need to interact with two different back end systems, depending on inbound request data One backend is a default target URL without SSL and another one is a dynamic target URL with 2-Way SSL What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Mireya at Apr 30, 2025, 01:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Google Cloud - Apigee Certified API Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Isreal
2 months ago
Wait, can you really use 2-way SSL dynamically like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
2 months ago
C sounds a bit complicated for runtime changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
2 months ago
I disagree, B could simplify the management of SSL settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
3 months ago
A seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
3 months ago
D is a solid option if you want clear separation of endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
3 months ago
I recall a similar question where we had to create multiple target endpoints. Option D might be the right approach if we need to define routing rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
3 months ago
Option C seems like it could work, but I’m a bit confused about how to implement 2-way SSL at runtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about Key-Value Maps in our last session. Could that be relevant here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
4 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar since we practiced using service callouts to handle different endpoints based on conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
4 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll go with option D and create a separate target endpoint with SSL configured, then define a route rule to pick the appropriate one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
4 months ago
I'm a little confused by the 2-way SSL requirement. I'll need to make sure I understand how to properly configure that in the AssignMessage policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
4 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. I'll go with option A - using the service callouts configuration and a condition to decide which backend to invoke.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the material on service callouts and key-value maps to see which option might be the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the different options and think through the implications of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
8 months ago
I think using a Key-Value Map configuration to access SSL and URL information is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
8 months ago
You know, I've been doing this for years, and I still can't keep track of all these SSL configurations. Why can't they just make it simpler?
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
9 months ago
I'm going with Option C. Overriding the target URL and SSL config at runtime is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
Loreen
8 months ago
I agree, using service callouts with a condition to decide which target to invoke seems like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
8 months ago
I think using a Key-Value Map configuration could work too. It's a good way to access SSL and URL information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
8 months ago
Option C sounds like the best approach. Overriding the target URL and SSL config at runtime is flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Royal
9 months ago
I would go with option D, creating another target endpoint with SSL configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
9 months ago
I agree with Art, it seems like the most logical approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
9 months ago
I think we should use service callouts configuration for each target and use a condition to decide which to invoke.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
10 months ago
Wait, did you hear about the developer who tried to use a quantum computer to manage their SSL keys? Talk about overkill!
upvoted 0 times
Linn
8 months ago
Wait, did you hear about the developer who tried to use a quantum computer to manage their SSL keys? Talk about overkill!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
8 months ago
B) Use a Key-Value Map configuration to access SSL and URL information to invoke target systems
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
9 months ago
A) Use service callouts configuration for each target, and use a condition to decide which to invoke.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joni
10 months ago
Option A seems like the most straightforward approach. Keep it simple, right?
upvoted 0 times
Anna
8 months ago
D) Create another target endpoint with SSL configured and define route rule to pick that depends on available variables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
8 months ago
Yes, that sounds like the best way to handle the different back end systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
9 months ago
A) Use service callouts configuration for each target, and use a condition to decide which to invoke.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel