Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GIAC GPEN Exam - Topic 10 Question 46 Discussion

Which of the following is NOT a Back orifice plug-in?
D) Beast
A) BOSOCK32
B) STCPIO
C) BOPeep

GIAC GPEN Exam - Topic 10 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for GIAC's GPEN exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 10
[All GPEN Questions]

Which of the following is NOT a Back orifice plug-in?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Latosha at Apr 27, 2024, 10:05 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium GPEN Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Emily
8 months ago
Wait, Beast isn't a plug-in? That's wild!
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
9 months ago
BOSOCK32 is definitely a Back Orifice plug-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
9 months ago
STCPIO sounds familiar, but I’m not convinced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
9 months ago
I think Beast is the odd one out here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleshia
9 months ago
Pretty sure BOPeep is a real plug-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
9 months ago
I think "STCPIO" sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it was part of the Back Orifice suite. This is tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
10 months ago
I vaguely recall that "Beast" was a term used in some context, but I can't remember if it was a plug-in or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
10 months ago
I feel like I've seen "BOPeep" mentioned in practice questions before, but I'm not 100% confident about the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
10 months ago
I think I remember studying about Back Orifice plug-ins, but I'm not entirely sure which one is not a plug-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
10 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question, but I want to double-check my understanding before answering. I'll review the key characteristics of Back Orifice plug-ins to identify the one that doesn't fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
10 months ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. I know Back Orifice has various plug-ins, so I'll need to consider each option carefully to determine which one is not part of the set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not too familiar with Back Orifice, so I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand the different plug-ins.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
10 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different Back Orifice plug-ins to determine which one is not part of the set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
10 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this. Back Orifice is a remote administration tool, so the plug-ins should be related to that functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions ICMP packets, so I'm thinking it might be something like ping or tcpdump. But the options don't include those, so I'm a little confused. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorian
10 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this one, and I'm pretty sure that the statement is true regarding Alibaba Cloud's support for KMS in dedicated clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
2 years ago
Good call, I'm marking Beast too. The rest sound familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
2 years ago
Makes sense. I'd go with Beast for NOT being a plug-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
2 years ago
Isn’t Beast a Trojan horse, not a Back Orifice plug-in?
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
2 years ago
I remember BOSOCK32 and BOPeep being plug-ins.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
2 years ago
Yeah, totally. I'm not sure about STCPIO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emelda
2 years ago
This question on Back Orifice plug-ins is confusing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel