GIAC GCPM Exam - Topic 8 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for GIAC's GCPM exam

Question #: 71
Topic #: 8

You work as a project manager for company Inc. You want to figure out the cumulative costs needed to bring poor quality service or products up to the mark as defined by project management. Which of the following Plan Quality techniques will help you to accomplish the task?

ACost of Quality

BBenchmarking

CBrainstorming

DCost benefit analysis

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Louisa at Jul 07, 2025, 09:36 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium GCPM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Elly

5 months ago

Cost benefit analysis sounds right, but is it really enough?

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherilyn

5 months ago

Brainstorming? Not sure how that fits in here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuki

6 months ago

I think Benchmarking could help too, but not as much.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alysa

6 months ago

Wait, can Cost of Quality really cover all those costs?

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

6 months ago

Cost of Quality is definitely the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Juliana

6 months ago

I vaguely recall that Brainstorming is more about generating ideas rather than calculating costs, so I don't think that's the answer here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheron

6 months ago

I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like Cost Benefit Analysis could also be relevant, but it seems more focused on evaluating options rather than just costs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolf

7 months ago

I'm not so sure about that. I remember something about Benchmarking being useful for comparing quality standards, but does it really help with costs?

upvoted 0 times

...

Audrie

7 months ago

I think the Cost of Quality might be the right choice since it directly relates to the expenses involved in improving quality.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keneth

7 months ago

This is a good test of our understanding of quality management tools. I think Cost of Quality is the most relevant technique here, as it will provide the specific cost data we need to address the quality issues. Straightforward approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ariel

7 months ago

I'm a little confused on the difference between Cost of Quality and Cost Benefit Analysis. Aren't they both focused on evaluating the financial aspects? I'll need to review those concepts again.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittni

7 months ago

Ah, I see what they're getting at. Cost of Quality is definitely the way to go - it will help us quantify the expenses required to bring the quality up to par. Solid strategy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dannette

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure here. Is Benchmarking also a valid option, since that could help us compare our quality to industry standards? I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Abel

8 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about quality management techniques. I think the Cost of Quality approach would be the best fit to determine the costs needed to improve poor quality.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jannette

10 months ago

This is a no-brainer. A) Cost of Quality is the way to go. I mean, who doesn't love a good quality-related expense analysis?

upvoted 0 times

Zona

8 months ago

A) Cost of Quality

upvoted 0 times

...

Katy

10 months ago

B) Benchmarking, all the way! Learn from the best, and you'll be the best. That's my strategy, at least.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carma

10 months ago

Hmm, I'm going with D) Cost benefit analysis. Gotta weigh those pros and cons, you know? It's the only way to really see if it's worth the investment.

upvoted 0 times

...