MENU
Which of the following strategies allows a user to limit access according to unique hardware information supplied by a potential client?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium GCIH Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
17 comments · newest first
SH
Shawn
11 months ago
I agree, C is the best option for limiting access!
FL
Flo
11 months ago
Wait, can MAC filtering really be trusted? Seems easy to spoof.
OC
Octavio
11 months ago
WEP is outdated, not a good choice here.
LO
Lonny
11 months ago
I thought EAP was more about authentication than hardware info?
IR
Iraida
11 months ago
Definitely C, MAC address filtering is the way to go!
AM
Amie
11 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think MAC address filtering was the focus. It seems to fit the description best.
WI
William
12 months ago
WTLS sounds familiar, but I can't recall it being related to hardware info. I feel like it’s more about securing data in transit.
LA
Lavonna
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember EAP being more about authentication protocols rather than limiting access based on hardware.
CA
Catrice
1 year ago
I think MAC address filtering is the right answer since it specifically deals with unique hardware identifiers.
LA
Lashawnda
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking about limiting access based on unique hardware info, and C - MAC address filtering - is the clear answer here. Confident I can get this one right.
CE
Celia
1 year ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I think the key is looking for a strategy that specifically mentions limiting access based on hardware info. I'm leaning towards C, but I'll double-check my notes just to be sure.
CO
Cory
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know MAC address filtering is used for access control, but I'm not sure if it's the best option here. I'll have to think it through more carefully.
GR
Graciela
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is C. MAC address filtering allows you to limit access based on the unique hardware addresses of client devices.
MA
Madalyn
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards the ION API Gateway option. That seems to be the interface that connects Infor ION to different applications and data sources.
NA
Natalya
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the statement regarding the Apex governor limits being relaxed during the constructor call. That doesn't sound quite right to me.
DE
Deonna
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. ERC are for defining standards on Ethereum, while EIP are for improving the Ethereum protocol itself. Option A looks like the right answer.
VI
Virgie
1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through. I'm leaning towards option A, customizing the cache keys to omit the protocol from the key. That should help improve the cache hit ratio by reducing the number of unique cache keys.