New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GIAC GCIH Exam - Topic 2 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for GIAC's GCIH exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 2
[All GCIH Questions]

Which of the following protocol loggers is used to detect ping sweep?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Lashon at May 18, 2024, 10:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium GCIH Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Daren
3 months ago
Wait, I didn't even know ping sweeps had specific loggers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
3 months ago
I thought it was pitl, but now I'm confused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefanie
3 months ago
Not so sure about that, isn't it A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunshine
4 months ago
Yeah, I've read that too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
4 months ago
I think it's D, ippl.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that ALPPI might have something to do with logging protocols, but I can't connect it to ping sweeps directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought DPSL was the one used for detecting various types of sweeps, but now I’m second-guessing myself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question last week, and I feel like PITL was mentioned in that context. Could it be the right answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
5 months ago
I think I remember something about IPPL being related to detecting network scans, but I'm not entirely sure if it's specifically for ping sweeps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
5 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. I'm going to go with my instinct on this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. I'll need to process this step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnathon
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to review my notes on protocol loggers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
5 months ago
Okay, I think I know the answer to this. Let me double-check my understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'll need to check the Azure Migrate requirements to see if disabling the firewall is the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between using node group names versus node names as the affinity labels. I'll need to double-check the details on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
5 months ago
I'm a little stuck on this one. The wording is tripping me up a bit. I know it has to do with brand extensions, but I'm not totally sure which option is correct. Gonna have to re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
5 months ago
I feel like the VIC 1387 was mentioned in our last training session, but I still might need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
5 months ago
Easy peasy! The URL with "contoso" in it is clearly the right answer. I'm confident I can nail this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. We need to simplify access control management and minimize the number of policies, while ensuring the central IT team has access to all projects and data can be shared across projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
2 years ago
D) ippl? More like D) 'Duh, Probably the Sensible Logger'! Come on, this one's a no-brainer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
2 years ago
D) ippl, for sure. Detecting ping sweeps is like finding a needle in a haystack, but ippl is the tool for the job.
upvoted 0 times
Francoise
2 years ago
D) ippl, for sure. Detecting ping sweeps is like finding a needle in a haystack, but ippl is the tool for the job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
2 years ago
A) lppi
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
2 years ago
I've heard great things about ippl, it's the go-to protocol logger for that kind of detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
2 years ago
I agree, ippl is definitely the way to go for detecting ping sweeps.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Graciela
2 years ago
A) lppi? Really? That just sounds made up. I'm going with D) ippl, it makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. But D) ippl sounds like it could be the right choice. Gotta love these protocol logging questions!
upvoted 0 times
Craig
2 years ago
Yeah, it does sound like it could be the one used to detect ping sweep.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
2 years ago
I think D) ippl could be the right choice too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesus
2 years ago
I think D) ippl is the correct answer. Ping sweep is a type of network reconnaissance, and ippl (IP protocol logger) is used to detect such activities.
upvoted 0 times
Rashida
2 years ago
Yes, ippl is used to detect ping sweep.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annalee
2 years ago
It seems like we all agree that ippl is the answer to detect ping sweep.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
2 years ago
I agree, ippl is the correct option for detecting ping sweep.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
2 years ago
That's correct. IP protocol logger is used to detect ping sweep.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
2 years ago
I agree, D) ippl is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
2 years ago
I believe ippl is the right choice as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shasta
2 years ago
Yes, you are correct. Ping sweep is indeed detected using IP protocol logger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
2 years ago
I think D) ippl is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel