New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GIAC GCFA Exam - Topic 3 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for GIAC's GCFA exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 3
[All GCFA Questions]

You are responsible for all computer security at your company. This includes initial investigation into alleged unauthorized activity. Which of the following are possible results of improperly gathering forensic evidence in an alleged computer crime by an employee?

Each correct answer represents a complete solution. Choose three.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Amira
3 months ago
All these outcomes are possible if the evidence isn't handled right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
3 months ago
I disagree, I don’t think D is likely unless you really mess up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
3 months ago
Wait, you can actually get sued for defamation? That’s wild!
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
4 months ago
I think option C is a big risk too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
4 months ago
Definitely could end up falsely accusing someone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
4 months ago
I’m not sure about option D, but I think it’s possible to face charges if you mishandle evidence. It seems serious!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C as well, since if evidence is mishandled, it could really hurt the case against the actual perpetrator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
4 months ago
I remember a practice question about false accusations, so I feel like option B is definitely a possibility here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
5 months ago
I think option A could be a result, but I'm not entirely sure how defamation works in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
5 months ago
Whoa, this is a serious topic. I better make sure I understand all the potential pitfalls before I start gathering any evidence. Don't want to mess this up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ria
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Properly handling the forensic evidence is crucial to avoid legal problems like being sued or even facing criminal charges yourself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a good handle on this. The key is to make sure the evidence is gathered properly to avoid things like false accusations or the company being unable to pursue the case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the specifics of what could go wrong if the forensic evidence is mishandled. I'll need to think through the possible consequences carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to be really careful about how I gather and handle any forensic evidence to avoid potential legal issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to carefully weigh the options and consider the implications of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
5 months ago
Okay, I think the key here is understanding how the ICP dimension is created and maintained in FM. Based on the options, it seems like the administrator can't directly edit the ICP dimension, but they can manage it through the entity or account member properties. I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
5 months ago
I think we discussed the External RESTful Services APIs as well, but it's been a while since we covered that topic. Wouldn't hurt to double-check!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
10 months ago
Haha, can you imagine being the one who accidentally defames the character of the accused? Talk about a lawsuit waiting to happen!
upvoted 0 times
Colton
9 months ago
C) Your company is unable to pursue the case against a perpetrator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
9 months ago
B) You falsely accuse an innocent employee.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
10 months ago
A) Your company is sued for defaming the character of an accused party.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Demetra
10 months ago
C is definitely a big one. If you botch the evidence gathering, the whole case goes down the drain. Talk about a career-ending move!
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
10 months ago
B and D, for sure! You mess up the investigation, you could ruin an innocent person's life and end up in the slammer yourself. Not a good look.
upvoted 0 times
Taryn
9 months ago
D) You are charged with criminal acts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
9 months ago
B) You falsely accuse an innocent employee.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
9 months ago
A) Your company is sued for defaming the character of an accused party.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janet
9 months ago
D) You are charged with criminal acts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
9 months ago
B) You falsely accuse an innocent employee.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
10 months ago
A) Your company is sued for defaming the character of an accused party.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nida
10 months ago
And don't forget the possibility of being sued for defaming the character of the accused party. It's important to handle evidence properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
10 months ago
Yeah, that's a big risk. It can also make it difficult for the company to pursue the case against the real perpetrator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
10 months ago
I think improperly gathering forensic evidence can lead to falsely accusing an innocent employee.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
10 months ago
And don't forget the possibility of being sued for defaming the character of the accused party. It's important to handle evidence properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
11 months ago
Ooh, this one's a tricky one! Gotta be real careful with that forensic evidence, don't want to end up in hot water, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
11 months ago
Yeah, that's a big risk. It can also make it difficult for the company to pursue the case against the real perpetrator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
11 months ago
I think improperly gathering forensic evidence can lead to falsely accusing an innocent employee.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel