I practiced a similar question before, and I think option B is risky. Giving everyone the same access could actually increase the chances of an insider threat, right?
I'm leaning towards option D because cross-training could help prevent one person from having too much control. But I wonder if that really addresses the insider threat directly.
I remember studying about insider threats, and I feel like option A could be effective too. Mandatory approvals seem like they would add a layer of scrutiny.
I think option C might be the best choice since regular log reviews can help catch unusual access patterns. But I'm not entirely sure if that's enough on its own.
Requiring multiple employees to be trained on each task could help prevent a single person from having too much control. That seems like a good strategy to me.
I think the mandatory approval process for access requests is the best way to detect potential insider threats. That way you can closely monitor who has access to sensitive information.
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Didn't the question mention enabling auto-provisioning for Azure Defender? Manually installing the agent might not be the right approach.
Altha
3 months agoIsaac
3 months agoArmando
3 months agoLauryn
4 months agoHester
4 months agoLavonna
4 months agoParis
4 months agoJade
4 months agoNguyet
5 months agoTruman
5 months agoDenna
5 months agoDeangelo
5 months agoHollis
5 months agoMollie
5 months agoJame
10 months agoJunita
8 months agoRana
8 months agoClaribel
9 months agoMariann
9 months agoClorinda
10 months agoAlton
9 months agoLina
10 months agoDenise
10 months agoAdolph
10 months agoMaira
10 months agoSue
10 months agoDarell
10 months agoLouann
10 months agoCarin
11 months agoRemedios
11 months agoFloyd
11 months ago