Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GIAC GCCC Exam - Topic 10 Question 14 Discussion

An auditor is focusing on potential vulnerabilities. Which of the following should cause an alert?
B) Windows host with an uptime of 382 days
A) Workstation on which a domain admin has never logged in
C) Server that has zero browser plug-ins
D) Fully patched guest machine that is not in the asset inventory

GIAC GCCC Exam - Topic 10 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for GIAC's GCCC exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 10
[All GCCC Questions]

An auditor is focusing on potential vulnerabilities. Which of the following should cause an alert?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Antonio
9 months ago
I disagree, uptime of 382 days can be normal for some servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
9 months ago
Wait, a server with zero plug-ins? That’s weird.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
10 months ago
C seems odd too, but not as alarming as D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
10 months ago
I think D is the biggest red flag here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
10 months ago
A is definitely suspicious!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
10 months ago
I feel like the server with zero browser plug-ins might be okay, but it could also indicate a lack of necessary updates. Not sure if it should trigger an alert though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
10 months ago
The uptime of 382 days seems suspicious, but I can't recall if that's a definite cause for concern. Maybe it just means it's stable?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
10 months ago
I think the fully patched guest machine not in the asset inventory should definitely raise an alert. It seems like a classic vulnerability scenario we practiced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
10 months ago
I remember discussing how a workstation without a domain admin login could be a red flag, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the most critical issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherron
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure on this one. Is it something to do with the message not being available or accessible? Or maybe the integrity of the information is in question?
upvoted 0 times
...
France
10 months ago
Okay, this looks like a straightforward PivotTable question. I think I can handle this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
10 months ago
I remember practicing something similar for the exam, and it feels like option A could be the right answer since it's checking out a commit directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
10 months ago
Okay, let me see here. I know read only=yes makes the share read-only, so the equivalent parameter would be one that also restricts write access. I'm leaning towards C - writeable=no, but I'll double-check the others just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel