MENU
Which set of factors would provide the basis for an optimal staffing calculation?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium GE0-806 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
DE
Devora
11 months ago
Not sure about D, seems too uncertain with predictions.
EV
Eva
11 months ago
B has some good points, but I lean towards C.
SH
Sherly
11 months ago
Surprised that A isn't more popular. Coverage is key!
LA
Lacresha
12 months ago
Definitely agree with C! Service objectives matter.
FL
Floyd
12 months ago
I think option C is the best choice.
BE
Bette
1 year ago
I keep mixing up the terms, but I think option A might be relevant since it mentions coverage and occupancy, which we covered in class.
MI
Mindy
1 year ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and it emphasized the importance of actual interaction volume. Could it be option C?
CA
Carey
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about actual AHT being important. Maybe option B?
JA
Jade
1 year ago
I think option C sounds familiar because we discussed how service objectives are crucial for staffing calculations.
AL
Alva
1 year ago
Option C definitely seems like the way to go. You need the actual data on interaction volume and AHT, plus the service level targets you're trying to hit. The other options are missing key pieces of the puzzle.
CU
Curt
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I was thinking option B might be the best, with actual interaction volume, actual AHT, and indirectly occupied time. But now I'm second-guessing myself. I'll have to think this through carefully.
RY
Ryan
1 year ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd go with option C - actual interaction volume, actual AHT, and the service objectives. That covers the key factors I'd expect to be important for an optimal staffing calculation.
RU
Ruthann
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by this question. There are a lot of factors to consider for staffing, so I'm not sure which set would be considered "optimal." I might have to go with my gut and select option A, but I'm not 100% confident in that.
CA
Cassi
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward question on adjusting for inflation. I'll need to calculate the real profits for 20X1 and 20X4 and compare them.
KI
Kimberely
2 years ago
I'm going with D. Minimum occupancy? That's my middle name! Well, actually, it's not, but it should be.
CA
Carissa
2 years ago
User 4: Actual interaction volume and AHT are my top picks. B for me.
MA
Maurine
2 years ago
User 3: D all the way! Minimum occupancy is where it's at.
EV
Eveline
2 years ago
User 2: I'm leaning towards A. Actual ASA and coverage are crucial.
JA
Jaleesa
2 years ago
Predicted interaction volume and potential AHT are also crucial factors to consider for optimal staffing.
CA
Carman
2 years ago
I think C is the way to go. Service objectives are key.
CA
Carman
2 years ago
Minimum occupancy is important for sure. It helps in planning the staffing levels effectively.
AL
Albert
2 years ago
I'm going with D. Minimum occupancy? That's my middle name! Well, actually, it's not, but it should be.
LO
Louvenia
2 years ago
C is the clear winner here. Who needs actual ASA or coverage when you've got the service objectives to guide you?
JA
Jacquline
2 years ago
Option B, all the way! Actual interaction volume, actual AHT, and indirectly occupied time - that's the secret sauce for optimal staffing, baby!
LI
Lili
2 years ago
User 3: Definitely, having the right data on actual interaction volume and AHT is key to ensuring we have the right number of staff on hand.
ZO
Zoila
2 years ago
User 2: I agree, those factors are crucial for calculating staffing needs accurately.
AL
Alberta
2 years ago
User 1: Option B, all the way! Actual interaction volume, actual AHT, and indirectly occupied time - that's the secret sauce for optimal staffing, baby!
KI
Kiley
2 years ago
D seems like the way to go. Predicted interaction volume, potential AHT, and minimum occupancy - that's the formula for success!
TA
Tamesha
2 years ago
User 4: Tamesha has a point. D does seem like a good formula for success in staffing calculation.
KA
Kasandra
2 years ago
User 3: I'm leaning towards D. Predicted interaction volume, potential AHT, and minimum occupancy make sense to me.
SA
Samira
2 years ago
User 2: I agree with Samira. C seems like a solid choice for optimal staffing calculation.
GI
Gilma
2 years ago
I think C is the best option. Actual interaction volume, actual AHT, and the service objectives are key.
LA
Lauran
2 years ago
I think option C is the right choice. Actual interaction volume, actual AHT, and the service objectives seem like the key factors to consider for optimal staffing.
FR
France
2 years ago
True, all the options have valid points to consider when calculating optimal staffing levels.
OL
Olive
2 years ago
I think option D could also be important, as predicted interaction volume and potential AHT can help with planning for future needs.
OM
Omega
2 years ago
But what about option A? Actual ASA and coverage are also crucial for determining staffing needs.
YO
Yolando
2 years ago
I agree, option C seems to cover all the important factors for staffing calculation.
CH
Charlie
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but D also seems like a possible answer.
MI
Michel
2 years ago
I agree with Ollie, because service objectives are important for staffing calculation.
OL
Ollie
2 years ago
I think the answer is C.