Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Genesys Exam GCP-GCX Topic 4 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Genesys's GCP-GCX exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 4
[All GCP-GCX Questions]

Bullseye routing method relaxes the required skills as the selection pool expands from one ring to the next.

What is the maximum number of rings that can be defined for Bullseye routing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The maximum number of rings that can be defined for Bullseye routing is 6. Bullseye routing is a type of AND Evaluation Method that evaluates agents based on predefined rings of skill requirements that relax as the selection pool expands from one ring to the next. Each ring can have one or more required skills and a minimum proficiency level for each skill. The first ring has the strictest skill requirements and the last ring has the loosest skill requirements. Reference: https://help.mypurecloud.com/articles/bullseye-routing/


by Joerg at Sep 19, 2025, 07:26 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium GCP-GCX Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Kris
3 days ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I feel like 8 rings was mentioned, but that seems too high now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
9 days ago
I think the maximum number of rings for Bullseye routing is 6, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
14 days ago
This seems like a straightforward application of the Bullseye routing concept. I'm confident I can work through this and arrive at the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
20 days ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is understanding that the Bullseye routing method relaxes the required skills as the selection pool expands. So the maximum number of rings would be the point where the selection pool is large enough to accommodate the least skilled candidates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
25 days ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky, and I'm not entirely familiar with the Bullseye routing method. I'll need to carefully read through the details to figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
1 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I'll think through the concept of Bullseye routing and the expansion of the selection pool to determine the maximum number of rings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
1 months ago
8 rings? That's more rings than a circus performer juggles. Talk about going the extra mile (or eight)!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
1 months ago
2 rings? That's like playing darts with a blindfold on. Might as well just throw the dart randomly and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
1 months ago
That's a good point, maybe having fewer rings is actually better for Bullseye routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
2 months ago
Hmm, I'd go with 4 rings. Anything more than that is just overkill, don't you think? I mean, how many targets do we really need?
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) 4 because having too many rings might make the routing method less effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
2 months ago
But the more rings there are, the more relaxed the required skills become.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) 6.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
2 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's 6 rings. That's the sweet spot for Bullseye routing, right? Not too few, not too many.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) 8.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel