Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM Exam PPM-001 Topic 7 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's PPM-001 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 7
[All PPM-001 Questions]

Which of the following is the LEAST effective way to influence the factors that create changes to the cost baseline?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Arthur at Sep 06, 2024, 05:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PPM-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lashaun
2 months ago
Option D? More like 'Don't notify the stakeholders and hope the changes just go away.' That's not how project management works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
2 months ago
Option A seems like a logical step. Reviewing the project scope with the functional manager responsible for the most changes could help identify the root cause and address it effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
2 months ago
Hmm, Option B sounds like a good approach. Explaining the impact of changes to the stakeholders could help them understand the consequences and potentially reduce the number of requests.
upvoted 0 times
Vilma
17 days ago
User 3: Yeah, communication is key in managing changes to the project scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
21 days ago
User 2: I agree. It can help them understand the consequences and think twice before requesting changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
1 months ago
User 1: I think Option B is a good idea. It's important to explain the impact of changes to stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darci
2 months ago
I think Option C is the way to go. If the scope is causing the most changes, it's better to eliminate that part of the project altogether.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
2 months ago
Option D seems too extreme. We should try to find a balanced approach that addresses the changes without completely shutting down the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
2 months ago
Option D? More like 'Don't notify the stakeholders and hope the changes just go away.' That's not how project management works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
2 months ago
Option A seems like a logical step. Reviewing the project scope with the functional manager responsible for the most changes could help identify the root cause and address it effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Ricki
23 days ago
D) Notify all stakeholders that no more changes will be allowed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
26 days ago
C) Eliminate the scope causing the most changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
27 days ago
B) Explain to those requesting changes the negative impact of change to the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
1 months ago
C) Eliminate the scope causing the most changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
1 months ago
B) Explain to those requesting changes the negative impact of change to the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
2 months ago
A) Review the project scope with the functional manager responsible for the greatest number of requested changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
2 months ago
A) Review the project scope with the functional manager responsible for the greatest number of requested changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Youlanda
3 months ago
Hmm, Option B sounds like a good approach. Explaining the impact of changes to the stakeholders could help them understand the consequences and potentially reduce the number of requests.
upvoted 0 times
Julio
1 months ago
I think that could cause resistance from stakeholders, it's better to communicate the impact first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
2 months ago
But what about Option D? Would it be effective to just stop all changes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
2 months ago
I agree, stakeholders need to understand the impact of their requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
3 months ago
Option B does seem like a good way to handle changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristofer
3 months ago
I think Option C is the way to go. If the scope is causing the most changes, it's better to eliminate that part of the project altogether.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
3 months ago
I believe C) Eliminate the scope causing the most changes is also not very effective. It's better to address the root cause of changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melda
3 months ago
I agree with Joaquin. It's important to communicate the negative impact of changes to stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
3 months ago
Option D seems too extreme. We should try to find a balanced approach that addresses the changes without completely shutting down the project.
upvoted 0 times
Tatum
2 months ago
Option D seems too extreme. We should try to find a balanced approach that addresses the changes without completely shutting down the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
2 months ago
C) Eliminate the scope causing the most changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
2 months ago
B) Explain to those requesting changes the negative impact of change to the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
3 months ago
A) Review the project scope with the functional manager responsible for the greatest number of requested changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joaquin
3 months ago
I think the least effective way is D) Notify all stakeholders that no more changes will be allowed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel