Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM PPM-001 Exam - Topic 7 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's PPM-001 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 7
[All PPM-001 Questions]

Which of the following is the LEAST effective way to influence the factors that create changes to the cost baseline?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Arthur at Sep 06, 2024, 05:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PPM-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Justa
5 months ago
Option A seems more productive than D for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
6 months ago
Wait, are we really saying no changes at all? That seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
6 months ago
Eliminating scope might not solve the root issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
6 months ago
Totally agree, cutting off changes won't help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
6 months ago
I think option D is the least effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hester
7 months ago
I vaguely recall that explaining the negative impacts of changes is usually a good strategy, so maybe B isn’t the least effective?
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
7 months ago
I feel like option A could be effective, but I’m leaning towards D as the least effective since it doesn't address the root cause of changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
7 months ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed the impact of changes on the cost baseline, but I’m not sure if eliminating scope is really the best approach either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
7 months ago
I think option D might be the least effective because just telling stakeholders no more changes can create frustration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
7 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think I've got it. Eliminating the scope causing the most changes seems like the least effective way to influence the factors creating cost baseline changes. I'll go with that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildegarde
7 months ago
I've got a strategy - I'll eliminate the obvious wrong answers first, then focus on evaluating the remaining options more closely. Explaining the impact of changes to stakeholders could be a good approach, but I'm not sure if it's the least effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Notifying stakeholders that no more changes will be allowed doesn't seem like the least effective approach to me. I'll need to re-read the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
7 months ago
Okay, let's see. Reviewing the scope with the functional manager seems like a good first step to understand the drivers of change. Eliminating the scope causing the most changes could also be effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
7 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different options and how they might impact the cost baseline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
7 months ago
This seems straightforward - I'd go with options A and D to automatically generate work orders with a 14-day generation horizon to meet the inspection requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
7 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think A and B are both true, but I'm not sure about the others. I'll need to review my notes on DSCP and forwarding classes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
12 months ago
Option D? More like 'Don't notify the stakeholders and hope the changes just go away.' That's not how project management works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
12 months ago
Option A seems like a logical step. Reviewing the project scope with the functional manager responsible for the most changes could help identify the root cause and address it effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
12 months ago
Hmm, Option B sounds like a good approach. Explaining the impact of changes to the stakeholders could help them understand the consequences and potentially reduce the number of requests.
upvoted 0 times
Vilma
10 months ago
User 3: Yeah, communication is key in managing changes to the project scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
10 months ago
User 2: I agree. It can help them understand the consequences and think twice before requesting changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
11 months ago
User 1: I think Option B is a good idea. It's important to explain the impact of changes to stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darci
12 months ago
I think Option C is the way to go. If the scope is causing the most changes, it's better to eliminate that part of the project altogether.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
12 months ago
Option D seems too extreme. We should try to find a balanced approach that addresses the changes without completely shutting down the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
12 months ago
Option D? More like 'Don't notify the stakeholders and hope the changes just go away.' That's not how project management works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
12 months ago
Option A seems like a logical step. Reviewing the project scope with the functional manager responsible for the most changes could help identify the root cause and address it effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Ricki
11 months ago
D) Notify all stakeholders that no more changes will be allowed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
11 months ago
C) Eliminate the scope causing the most changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
11 months ago
B) Explain to those requesting changes the negative impact of change to the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
11 months ago
C) Eliminate the scope causing the most changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
11 months ago
B) Explain to those requesting changes the negative impact of change to the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
11 months ago
A) Review the project scope with the functional manager responsible for the greatest number of requested changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
11 months ago
A) Review the project scope with the functional manager responsible for the greatest number of requested changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Youlanda
1 year ago
Hmm, Option B sounds like a good approach. Explaining the impact of changes to the stakeholders could help them understand the consequences and potentially reduce the number of requests.
upvoted 0 times
Julio
11 months ago
I think that could cause resistance from stakeholders, it's better to communicate the impact first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
11 months ago
But what about Option D? Would it be effective to just stop all changes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
11 months ago
I agree, stakeholders need to understand the impact of their requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
1 year ago
Option B does seem like a good way to handle changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristofer
1 year ago
I think Option C is the way to go. If the scope is causing the most changes, it's better to eliminate that part of the project altogether.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
1 year ago
I believe C) Eliminate the scope causing the most changes is also not very effective. It's better to address the root cause of changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melda
1 year ago
I agree with Joaquin. It's important to communicate the negative impact of changes to stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 year ago
Option D seems too extreme. We should try to find a balanced approach that addresses the changes without completely shutting down the project.
upvoted 0 times
Tatum
12 months ago
Option D seems too extreme. We should try to find a balanced approach that addresses the changes without completely shutting down the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
12 months ago
C) Eliminate the scope causing the most changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
1 year ago
B) Explain to those requesting changes the negative impact of change to the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
1 year ago
A) Review the project scope with the functional manager responsible for the greatest number of requested changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joaquin
1 year ago
I think the least effective way is D) Notify all stakeholders that no more changes will be allowed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel