From what I recall, analogous estimating doesn't use contingency reserves like some other techniques do. So that's probably not the right answer. I'm leaning towards the "less costly and time consuming" option, but I want to double-check my notes just to be sure.
Analogous estimating allows you to apply the technique to specific segments of the work, which I think could be really useful. That flexibility seems like a big advantage over some of the other cost estimate methods.
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know analogous estimating uses historical data, but I can't remember if that makes it more or less accurate than other methods. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
I think the key advantage of analogous estimating is that it's less costly and time consuming compared to other techniques. That seems like the most straightforward answer.
The business analysis checklist is definitely the way to go here. It's a comprehensive tool that can help the BA ensure all requirements are verified, which is exactly what the project board is concerned about. Easy choice in my opinion.
Julio
3 months agoIlona
3 months agoCarey
3 months agoShizue
4 months agoMattie
4 months agoJustine
4 months agoWillis
4 months agoAshleigh
4 months agoKanisha
5 months agoLino
5 months agoSherill
5 months agoIvette
5 months agoLakeesha
5 months agoDelila
5 months agoMitsue
9 months agoGlendora
10 months agoTrevor
8 months agoSerina
8 months agoVicente
9 months agoEura
10 months agoEttie
8 months agoLuther
9 months agoChau
9 months agoLucy
10 months agoAnnamae
8 months agoMarylyn
8 months agoBettina
9 months agoViva
9 months agoKallie
10 months agoClaudio
10 months agoMadalyn
10 months agoMaryanne
10 months agoHerminia
11 months agoJesusa
11 months ago