Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GAQM PPM-001 Exam - Topic 3 Question 100 Discussion

What is a specific advantage of analogous estimating in comparison with other cost estimate techniques?
C) Can be applied to segments of work
A) Uses contingency reserves
B) Less costly and time consuming
D) More accurate

GAQM PPM-001 Exam - Topic 3 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's PPM-001 exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 3
[All PPM-001 Questions]

What is a specific advantage of analogous estimating in comparison with other cost estimate techniques?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Julio
7 months ago
Yeah, I heard it saves a lot of time compared to detailed methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
8 months ago
Can it really be applied to segments of work? Seems tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
8 months ago
Agreed, it's super quick to get estimates!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
8 months ago
I disagree, I think it's not always accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
8 months ago
It's definitely less costly and time consuming!
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
9 months ago
I feel like I read that it’s not necessarily more accurate than other methods, so I’m leaning towards the time-saving aspect being the main advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willis
9 months ago
I practiced a question like this, and I think the key point was that it’s quicker to implement, which makes it really useful in tight timelines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
9 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about it being applicable to segments of work. That might be an advantage too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
9 months ago
I think one of the advantages of analogous estimating is that it’s less costly and time-consuming compared to other methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lino
9 months ago
From what I recall, analogous estimating doesn't use contingency reserves like some other techniques do. So that's probably not the right answer. I'm leaning towards the "less costly and time consuming" option, but I want to double-check my notes just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
9 months ago
Analogous estimating allows you to apply the technique to specific segments of the work, which I think could be really useful. That flexibility seems like a big advantage over some of the other cost estimate methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know analogous estimating uses historical data, but I can't remember if that makes it more or less accurate than other methods. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
9 months ago
I think the key advantage of analogous estimating is that it's less costly and time consuming compared to other techniques. That seems like the most straightforward answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
9 months ago
The business analysis checklist is definitely the way to go here. It's a comprehensive tool that can help the BA ensure all requirements are verified, which is exactly what the project board is concerned about. Easy choice in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
1 year ago
If they really wanted to test our estimating skills, they should've asked us to estimate the cost of this exam. That would be a real challenge!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 year ago
Maybe I should just roll the dice and pick A. Contingency reserves sound like a good time to me!
upvoted 0 times
Trevor
1 year ago
It's true that it uses contingency reserves, but there are other advantages to consider as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
1 year ago
Analogous estimating is less costly and time consuming, so it's a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
1 year ago
Go for it! Contingency reserves are always a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eura
1 year ago
D, definitely D. Accuracy is key in this field, and I'm not looking to wing it.
upvoted 0 times
Ettie
1 year ago
Using contingency reserves can also help with accuracy, so it's a good combination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
1 year ago
I agree, having a more accurate estimate can save a lot of trouble down the line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
1 year ago
D, definitely D. Accuracy is key in this field, and I'm not looking to wing it.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lucy
1 year ago
I'm thinking C is the best choice. Analogy is a powerful tool, and being able to apply it to specific segments is a big plus.
upvoted 0 times
Annamae
1 year ago
In the end, I think it's a combination of factors that make analogous estimating advantageous.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
1 year ago
That's true, using contingency reserves can definitely help with unexpected costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
1 year ago
But don't you think using contingency reserves, like option A, is also important for accurate cost estimates?
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
1 year ago
I agree, being able to apply analogous estimating to segments of work can be very beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
1 year ago
Yes, it allows for a more detailed and accurate cost estimate for each part of the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
1 year ago
I agree, being able to apply analogous estimating to specific segments of work can be very beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Madalyn
1 year ago
Option B seems like the way to go. I don't want to spend too much time or money on this exam, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
1 year ago
But doesn't it also use contingency reserves to account for uncertainties?
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
1 year ago
I agree with Jesusa. It's helpful to break down the estimate into smaller parts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
1 year ago
I think the advantage of analogous estimating is that it can be applied to segments of work.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel