From what I recall, analogous estimating doesn't use contingency reserves like some other techniques do. So that's probably not the right answer. I'm leaning towards the "less costly and time consuming" option, but I want to double-check my notes just to be sure.
Analogous estimating allows you to apply the technique to specific segments of the work, which I think could be really useful. That flexibility seems like a big advantage over some of the other cost estimate methods.
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know analogous estimating uses historical data, but I can't remember if that makes it more or less accurate than other methods. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
I think the key advantage of analogous estimating is that it's less costly and time consuming compared to other techniques. That seems like the most straightforward answer.
The business analysis checklist is definitely the way to go here. It's a comprehensive tool that can help the BA ensure all requirements are verified, which is exactly what the project board is concerned about. Easy choice in my opinion.
Julio
4 months agoIlona
5 months agoCarey
5 months agoShizue
5 months agoMattie
5 months agoJustine
6 months agoWillis
6 months agoAshleigh
6 months agoKanisha
6 months agoLino
6 months agoSherill
6 months agoIvette
6 months agoLakeesha
6 months agoDelila
6 months agoMitsue
11 months agoGlendora
11 months agoTrevor
9 months agoSerina
10 months agoVicente
10 months agoEura
11 months agoEttie
10 months agoLuther
10 months agoChau
11 months agoLucy
12 months agoAnnamae
10 months agoMarylyn
10 months agoBettina
10 months agoViva
10 months agoKallie
11 months agoClaudio
11 months agoMadalyn
12 months agoMaryanne
12 months agoHerminia
1 year agoJesusa
1 year ago