Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM ISO27-13-001 Exam - Topic 7 Question 112 Discussion

There was a fire in a branch of the company Midwest Insurance. The fire department quickly arrived at the scene and could extinguish the fire before it spread and burned down the entire premises. The server, however, was destroyed in the fire. The backup tapes kept in another room had melted and many other documents were lost for good.What is an example of the indirect damage caused by this fire?
D) Water damage due to the fire extinguishers
A) Melted backup tapes
B) Burned computer systems
C) Burned documents

GAQM ISO27-13-001 Exam - Topic 7 Question 112 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's ISO27-13-001 exam
Question #: 112
Topic #: 7
[All ISO27-13-001 Questions]

There was a fire in a branch of the company Midwest Insurance. The fire department quickly arrived at the scene and could extinguish the fire before it spread and burned down the entire premises. The server, however, was destroyed in the fire. The backup tapes kept in another room had melted and many other documents were lost for good.

What is an example of the indirect damage caused by this fire?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Karima at May 31, 2026, 05:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISO27-13-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Celeste
2 days ago
But that’s direct damage, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
7 days ago
I was thinking A, melted tapes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
12 days ago
Yeah, it’s indirect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
18 days ago
Water damage? Makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
23 days ago
I think D is the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
28 days ago
Tough question!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
1 month ago
Totally agree, water damage is often overlooked!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
1 month ago
Wait, how did the backup tapes melt? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
1 month ago
Melted backup tapes are definitely indirect damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamela
2 months ago
I think burned documents are direct damage, not indirect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
2 months ago
Water damage from the extinguishers is a big issue!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
2 months ago
I’m confused about this one. I thought melted backup tapes were indirect too, but they were still part of the direct loss from the fire, weren’t they?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
2 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D as well. It seems like the water damage is a consequence of the fire response, which makes it indirect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
2 months ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed direct vs. indirect damage. I feel like burned documents would be considered direct damage, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
2 months ago
I think indirect damage could be something like water damage from the fire extinguishers, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel