MENU
A non-human threat for computer systems is a flood. In which situation is a flood always a relevant threat?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium ISO-IEC-LI Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
27 comments · newest first
RO
Rosio
10 months ago
Really? I thought insurance would cover that risk.
DU
Dustin
10 months ago
A flood threat is always there if you're near water!
LA
Lai
11 months ago
I think D makes more sense, rivers can flood.
SH
Sharmaine
11 months ago
C seems off, insurance doesn't stop floods!
EL
Elfriede
11 months ago
Definitely B, cellars are risky!
DO
Doretha
11 months ago
I recall that risk analysis is crucial, but I don't think it directly relates to the flood threat being relevant, so A seems less likely.
DU
Dudley
12 months ago
I practiced a question about environmental risks, and I think being below ground level could definitely increase flood risk, so B might be the answer.
MI
Mike
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like a flood could be a threat regardless of insurance status, so maybe C is relevant too?
QU
Quiana
12 months ago
I remember discussing how location plays a big role in risk assessment, so I think option D makes sense.
GR
Gracie
1 year ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. There are a lot of factors to consider when it comes to flood risk. I'll need to really analyze each option closely to determine the best answer.
NI
Niesha
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key here is to focus on the conditions that would make a flood a constant threat, regardless of other factors. I'm pretty confident I can nail this one.
AN
Antonio
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know floods can be a threat, but I'm not sure if there's always a situation where it's always relevant. Let me think this through carefully.
RY
Ryann
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about when a flood would always be a relevant threat to computer systems. I think I know the answer, but I'll double-check the options just to be sure.
CA
Candida
1 year ago
Wait, so if the risk analysis hasn't been done, does that mean they don't even know they're in a flood-prone area? That's just plain negligence.
EM
Emerson
1 year ago
Haha, the organization being near a river is definitely a recipe for disaster. Might as well just keep the computers on a boat!
ST
Stefany
1 year ago
B) When computer systems are kept in a cellar below ground level.
KI
Kiera
1 year ago
A) If the risk analysis has not been carried out.
KI
Kimberely
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd say the correct answer is B. Can't trust those basement computers, they're just waiting to get swept away!
CE
Cecil
1 year ago
Yeah, floods can easily damage computers in a cellar.
EM
Emmett
1 year ago
I agree, basement computers are definitely at risk.
JE
Jesse
1 year ago
I believe when the organization is located near a river, a flood is definitely a relevant threat.
MA
Martina
1 year ago
I agree with Karma. If the risk analysis has not been carried out, it's also a relevant threat.
KA
Karma
1 year ago
I think a flood is always a relevant threat when computer systems are kept in a cellar below ground level.
ME
Merrilee
1 year ago
A flood is always a threat if the computer systems are kept in a cellar below ground level. That's just asking for trouble!
MA
Matthew
1 year ago
A: It's important to consider the location when assessing threats.
TH
Therese
1 year ago
B: Yeah, floods can easily damage them in that situation.
BO
Bobbye
1 year ago
A: Keeping computer systems in a cellar below ground level is risky.