MENU
Responsibilities for information security in projects should be defined and allocated to:
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium ISO-IEC-LI Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
DO
Doretha
10 months ago
B is the way to go, clear definitions help avoid confusion.
AN
Anissa
10 months ago
Not sure about that, C seems more reliable.
MA
Markus
10 months ago
I think it should be B, roles are key!
DI
Diane
11 months ago
Surprised that D is even an option, that could get messy.
FE
Felix
11 months ago
Definitely A, project managers need to take charge!
HY
Hyman
11 months ago
I recall discussing asset ownership in class, and it seems like the owner should definitely have some responsibility, but I’m not convinced it’s the only answer.
LA
Lashunda
11 months ago
I lean towards option B since it aligns with the framework we studied, but I wonder if the InfoSec officer should have a more active role too.
SU
Suzan
12 months ago
I remember a practice question where the project manager was emphasized as the main point of contact for security, but I feel like it might be more complex than that.
GL
Glory
12 months ago
I think the responsibilities should be defined by the specified roles in the project management method, but I'm not entirely sure if that covers everything.
SH
Shoshana
12 months ago
I feel confident about this one. Information security is a critical aspect of project management, and the responsibilities should be clearly defined and allocated to the appropriate roles.
JO
Jose
1 year ago
This is a good test of my understanding of information security governance. I'll need to consider the different stakeholders and their responsibilities.
DE
Devorah
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify the roles that are typically involved in information security management for projects. I'll review the options carefully.
PA
Paulene
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know information security is important, but I'm not sure which specific roles are responsible for it in a project setting.
LI
Linwood
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about information security responsibilities in projects. I'll need to think carefully about the different roles and responsibilities mentioned.
SH
Shanice
2 years ago
I'm going with B, but I'd also like to suggest hiring a security consultant named 'Agent 007' just for fun.
FR
Frederica
1 year ago
Definitely, we should prioritize defining and allocating responsibilities for information security in projects.
NA
Nada
1 year ago
Hiring a security consultant named 'Agent 007' sounds interesting, but I think sticking to the allocated responsibilities is more important.
EV
Eveline
1 year ago
User 2: That's true, but hiring 'Agent 007' sounds like a fun idea!
CH
Charlene
1 year ago
I agree, having specified roles defined in the organization's project management method is crucial for information security.
JE
Jesusita
1 year ago
User 1: I think B is the best option, it's important to follow the project management method.
NO
Nobuko
1 year ago
I think B is the best option, it aligns with the project management method.
AS
Ashley
2 years ago
B is the only option that makes sense. Who else would know the security requirements better than the project management team?
AR
Arthur
2 years ago
C is the way to go! The InfoSec officer is like the security wizard - they'll make sure everything is locked down tight.
TR
Troy
1 year ago
D) the owner of the involved asset
JU
Juan
1 year ago
C) the InfoSec officer
GL
Glory
1 year ago
B) specified roles defined in the used project management method of the organization
CU
Curt
2 years ago
A) the project manager
LE
Lenna
2 years ago
I'm torn between B and D. Shouldn't the project manager and asset owner work together on this?
AL
Alana
2 years ago
I think the InfoSec officer should also play a role in defining and allocating responsibilities for information security.
MY
Myrtie
2 years ago
I'm voting for D. The asset owner knows their stuff best, so they should be in charge of security for that asset.
CA
Cammy
2 years ago
Definitely B. The project management method is the way to go - it's like a roadmap for security responsibilities!
TW
Twana
2 years ago
The InfoSec officer should definitely be involved in defining and allocating security responsibilities.
OD
Odette
2 years ago
I think the project manager should also play a role in ensuring information security.
FA
Fabiola
2 years ago
I agree, the project management method is crucial for defining security responsibilities.
JU
Julianna
2 years ago
I believe it should be specified roles defined in the organization's project management method.
ME
Melissa
2 years ago
I agree with Kallie, the project manager is ultimately responsible for the project's success.
KA
Kallie
2 years ago
I think responsibilities should be defined by the project manager.