New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM ISO-IEC-LI Exam - Topic 2 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's ISO-IEC-LI exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 2
[All ISO-IEC-LI Questions]

Responsibilities for information security in projects should be defined and allocated to:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Gail at Mar 23, 2025, 07:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISO-IEC-LI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Doretha
2 months ago
B is the way to go, clear definitions help avoid confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
2 months ago
Not sure about that, C seems more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
2 months ago
I think it should be B, roles are key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
3 months ago
Surprised that D is even an option, that could get messy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
3 months ago
Definitely A, project managers need to take charge!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
3 months ago
I recall discussing asset ownership in class, and it seems like the owner should definitely have some responsibility, but I’m not convinced it’s the only answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
3 months ago
I lean towards option B since it aligns with the framework we studied, but I wonder if the InfoSec officer should have a more active role too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzan
4 months ago
I remember a practice question where the project manager was emphasized as the main point of contact for security, but I feel like it might be more complex than that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
4 months ago
I think the responsibilities should be defined by the specified roles in the project management method, but I'm not entirely sure if that covers everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shoshana
4 months ago
I feel confident about this one. Information security is a critical aspect of project management, and the responsibilities should be clearly defined and allocated to the appropriate roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
4 months ago
This is a good test of my understanding of information security governance. I'll need to consider the different stakeholders and their responsibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
4 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify the roles that are typically involved in information security management for projects. I'll review the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know information security is important, but I'm not sure which specific roles are responsible for it in a project setting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about information security responsibilities in projects. I'll need to think carefully about the different roles and responsibilities mentioned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
10 months ago
I'm going with B, but I'd also like to suggest hiring a security consultant named 'Agent 007' just for fun.
upvoted 0 times
Frederica
9 months ago
Definitely, we should prioritize defining and allocating responsibilities for information security in projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
9 months ago
Hiring a security consultant named 'Agent 007' sounds interesting, but I think sticking to the allocated responsibilities is more important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
9 months ago
User 2: That's true, but hiring 'Agent 007' sounds like a fun idea!
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
9 months ago
I agree, having specified roles defined in the organization's project management method is crucial for information security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
10 months ago
User 1: I think B is the best option, it's important to follow the project management method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
10 months ago
I think B is the best option, it aligns with the project management method.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashley
11 months ago
B is the only option that makes sense. Who else would know the security requirements better than the project management team?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
11 months ago
C is the way to go! The InfoSec officer is like the security wizard - they'll make sure everything is locked down tight.
upvoted 0 times
Troy
9 months ago
D) the owner of the involved asset
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
9 months ago
C) the InfoSec officer
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
10 months ago
B) specified roles defined in the used project management method of the organization
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
10 months ago
A) the project manager
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenna
11 months ago
I'm torn between B and D. Shouldn't the project manager and asset owner work together on this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
11 months ago
I think the InfoSec officer should also play a role in defining and allocating responsibilities for information security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
11 months ago
I'm voting for D. The asset owner knows their stuff best, so they should be in charge of security for that asset.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
11 months ago
Definitely B. The project management method is the way to go - it's like a roadmap for security responsibilities!
upvoted 0 times
Twana
10 months ago
The InfoSec officer should definitely be involved in defining and allocating security responsibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
10 months ago
I think the project manager should also play a role in ensuring information security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
11 months ago
I agree, the project management method is crucial for defining security responsibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julianna
11 months ago
I believe it should be specified roles defined in the organization's project management method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
11 months ago
I agree with Kallie, the project manager is ultimately responsible for the project's success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
11 months ago
I think responsibilities should be defined by the project manager.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel