Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM Exam ISO-IEC-LI Topic 2 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's ISO-IEC-LI exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 2
[All ISO-IEC-LI Questions]

Responsibilities for information security in projects should be defined and allocated to:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Gail at Mar 23, 2025, 07:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISO-IEC-LI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Shanice
3 months ago
I'm going with B, but I'd also like to suggest hiring a security consultant named 'Agent 007' just for fun.
upvoted 0 times
Frederica
2 months ago
Definitely, we should prioritize defining and allocating responsibilities for information security in projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
2 months ago
Hiring a security consultant named 'Agent 007' sounds interesting, but I think sticking to the allocated responsibilities is more important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
2 months ago
User 2: That's true, but hiring 'Agent 007' sounds like a fun idea!
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
2 months ago
I agree, having specified roles defined in the organization's project management method is crucial for information security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
2 months ago
User 1: I think B is the best option, it's important to follow the project management method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
3 months ago
I think B is the best option, it aligns with the project management method.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashley
3 months ago
B is the only option that makes sense. Who else would know the security requirements better than the project management team?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
3 months ago
C is the way to go! The InfoSec officer is like the security wizard - they'll make sure everything is locked down tight.
upvoted 0 times
Troy
2 months ago
D) the owner of the involved asset
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
2 months ago
C) the InfoSec officer
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
B) specified roles defined in the used project management method of the organization
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
3 months ago
A) the project manager
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenna
3 months ago
I'm torn between B and D. Shouldn't the project manager and asset owner work together on this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
3 months ago
I think the InfoSec officer should also play a role in defining and allocating responsibilities for information security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
4 months ago
I'm voting for D. The asset owner knows their stuff best, so they should be in charge of security for that asset.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
4 months ago
Definitely B. The project management method is the way to go - it's like a roadmap for security responsibilities!
upvoted 0 times
Twana
3 months ago
The InfoSec officer should definitely be involved in defining and allocating security responsibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
3 months ago
I think the project manager should also play a role in ensuring information security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
3 months ago
I agree, the project management method is crucial for defining security responsibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julianna
4 months ago
I believe it should be specified roles defined in the organization's project management method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
4 months ago
I agree with Kallie, the project manager is ultimately responsible for the project's success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
4 months ago
I think responsibilities should be defined by the project manager.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel