Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

GAQM ISO-IEC-LI Exam - Topic 2 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's ISO-IEC-LI exam

Question #: 95
Topic #: 2

[All ISO-IEC-LI Questions]

Responsibilities for information security in projects should be defined and allocated to:

Athe project manager

Bspecified roles defined in the used project management method of the organization

Cthe InfoSec officer

Dthe owner of the involved asset

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Gail at Mar 23, 2025, 07:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISO-IEC-LI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Doretha

8 months ago

B is the way to go, clear definitions help avoid confusion.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anissa

8 months ago

Not sure about that, C seems more reliable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Markus

9 months ago

I think it should be B, roles are key!

upvoted 0 times

...

Diane

9 months ago

Surprised that D is even an option, that could get messy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felix

9 months ago

Definitely A, project managers need to take charge!

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyman

9 months ago

I recall discussing asset ownership in class, and it seems like the owner should definitely have some responsibility, but I’m not convinced it’s the only answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashunda

10 months ago

I lean towards option B since it aligns with the framework we studied, but I wonder if the InfoSec officer should have a more active role too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Suzan

10 months ago

I remember a practice question where the project manager was emphasized as the main point of contact for security, but I feel like it might be more complex than that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

10 months ago

I think the responsibilities should be defined by the specified roles in the project management method, but I'm not entirely sure if that covers everything.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shoshana

10 months ago

I feel confident about this one. Information security is a critical aspect of project management, and the responsibilities should be clearly defined and allocated to the appropriate roles.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jose

10 months ago

This is a good test of my understanding of information security governance. I'll need to consider the different stakeholders and their responsibilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Devorah

11 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify the roles that are typically involved in information security management for projects. I'll review the options carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paulene

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know information security is important, but I'm not sure which specific roles are responsible for it in a project setting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linwood

11 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about information security responsibilities in projects. I'll need to think carefully about the different roles and responsibilities mentioned.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shanice

1 year ago

I'm going with B, but I'd also like to suggest hiring a security consultant named 'Agent 007' just for fun.

upvoted 0 times

Frederica

1 year ago

Definitely, we should prioritize defining and allocating responsibilities for information security in projects.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nada

1 year ago

Hiring a security consultant named 'Agent 007' sounds interesting, but I think sticking to the allocated responsibilities is more important.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eveline

1 year ago

User 2: That's true, but hiring 'Agent 007' sounds like a fun idea!

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlene

1 year ago

I agree, having specified roles defined in the organization's project management method is crucial for information security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusita

1 year ago

User 1: I think B is the best option, it's important to follow the project management method.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nobuko

1 year ago

I think B is the best option, it aligns with the project management method.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Ashley

1 year ago

B is the only option that makes sense. Who else would know the security requirements better than the project management team?

upvoted 0 times

...

Arthur

1 year ago

C is the way to go! The InfoSec officer is like the security wizard - they'll make sure everything is locked down tight.

upvoted 0 times

Troy

1 year ago

D) the owner of the involved asset

upvoted 0 times

...

Juan

1 year ago

C) the InfoSec officer

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

1 year ago

B) specified roles defined in the used project management method of the organization

upvoted 0 times

...

Curt

1 year ago

A) the project manager

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Lenna

1 year ago

I'm torn between B and D. Shouldn't the project manager and asset owner work together on this?

upvoted 0 times

...

Alana

1 year ago

I think the InfoSec officer should also play a role in defining and allocating responsibilities for information security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myrtie

1 year ago

I'm voting for D. The asset owner knows their stuff best, so they should be in charge of security for that asset.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cammy

1 year ago

Definitely B. The project management method is the way to go - it's like a roadmap for security responsibilities!

upvoted 0 times

Twana

1 year ago

The InfoSec officer should definitely be involved in defining and allocating security responsibilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Odette

1 year ago

I think the project manager should also play a role in ensuring information security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fabiola

1 year ago

I agree, the project management method is crucial for defining security responsibilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Julianna

1 year ago

I believe it should be specified roles defined in the organization's project management method.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissa

1 year ago

I agree with Kallie, the project manager is ultimately responsible for the project's success.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kallie

1 year ago

I think responsibilities should be defined by the project manager.

upvoted 0 times

...