Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM Exam CPEH-001 Topic 6 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CPEH-001 exam
Question #: 98
Topic #: 6
[All CPEH-001 Questions]

Which of the following systems would not respond correctly to an nmap XMAS scan?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

SYSKEY is a utility that encrypts the hashed password information in a SAM database using a 128-bit encryption key.


by Felix at Sep 15, 2024, 01:30 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPEH-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Clemencia
2 months ago
XMAS scan? Sounds like a festive way to test the systems. I wonder if any of them would respond with a 'Ho, ho, ho!' instead of an error.
upvoted 0 times
Anissa
12 days ago
D) RedHat Linux 8.0 running Apache Web Server
upvoted 0 times
...
Essie
14 days ago
C) Any version of IRIX
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
27 days ago
B) Any Solaris version running SAMBA Server
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
1 months ago
A) Windows 2000 Server running IIS 5
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anna
2 months ago
Windows 2000 Server with IIS 5? That's like a dinosaur in the IT world. I'm surprised that's even an option!
upvoted 0 times
Tran
1 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Solaris with SAMBA might not be affected by an nmap XMAS scan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
1 months ago
I think the Solaris version running SAMBA Server would not respond correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
2 months ago
True, Windows 2000 Server is quite outdated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sabine
3 months ago
RedHat Linux 8.0 with Apache? That's so last decade! I bet the newer versions of Linux would handle the XMAS scan better.
upvoted 0 times
Delfina
2 months ago
C) Any version of IRIX
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
2 months ago
B) Any Solaris version running SAMBA Server
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
2 months ago
A) Windows 2000 Server running IIS 5
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lindy
3 months ago
Solaris running SAMBA? That's an interesting combination. I wonder if the SAMBA server would be able to handle the XMAS scan properly.
upvoted 0 times
Francoise
28 days ago
Yeah, I agree. IRIX could be a vulnerable system in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
29 days ago
I think IRIX might not respond correctly to the XMAS scan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
1 months ago
It's definitely an interesting combination to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 months ago
I'm not sure if SAMBA on Solaris would handle the XMAS scan correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
1 months ago
D) RedHat Linux 8.0 running Apache Web Server
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
1 months ago
C) Any version of IRIX
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
2 months ago
B) Any Solaris version running SAMBA Server
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
3 months ago
A) Windows 2000 Server running IIS 5
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Casie
3 months ago
I'm pretty sure the IRIX system would respond incorrectly to the XMAS scan. Isn't IRIX an outdated Unix variant that's no longer supported?
upvoted 0 times
Zack
2 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
King
2 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jacob
3 months ago
I disagree, I think RedHat Linux 8.0 running Apache Web Server would not respond correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
4 months ago
I agree with Carla, Windows systems are known to not respond well to XMAS scans.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
4 months ago
I think Windows 2000 Server running IIS 5 would not respond correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel