Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM CLSSYB-001 Exam - Topic 6 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CLSSYB-001 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 6
[All CLSSYB-001 Questions]

A Belt gathered the following defect data for a polyurethane production line and wanted to assemble it into a Pareto Chart. The correct order from left to right in the chart would be:

Data:Trimming37

Forming61

Packaging29

Sealing5

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Kati at Mar 20, 2023, 03:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CLSSYB-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Chana
6 months ago
Packaging should be before Trimming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
6 months ago
Yup, that makes total sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
7 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
7 months ago
Definitely goes in that order!
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
7 months ago
The defects are 61, 37, 29, and 5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
7 months ago
I believe the order should definitely start with Forming, but I’m not confident about where Trimming and Packaging fit in after that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
7 months ago
I feel like I might be mixing up the order. I thought it was supposed to be from the lowest to the highest, but that doesn't seem right for a Pareto Chart.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
7 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to arrange defects by frequency. I think it was something like Trimming, Packaging, and then Sealing, but I can't recall the exact numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
7 months ago
I think the Pareto Chart should start with the highest defect count, which is Forming at 61, but I'm not completely sure about the order after that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
7 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought Packaging was higher than Sealing, but I can't remember if it goes before or after Trimming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
7 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to rank defects, and I think it was always about starting with the highest. So maybe it's Forming first?
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
7 months ago
I think the highest defect was Forming with 61, so it should be on the left, but I can't recall the rest clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
7 months ago
I remember that in a Pareto Chart, we should order the defects from highest to lowest frequency, but I'm not sure about the exact numbers here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
7 months ago
Hmm, not sure where to start on this one. There are a lot of factors to consider when designing the Azure infrastructure. I'll need to review my notes on Azure best practices to make sure I cover all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
7 months ago
Wait, are you sure the autoscaler will handle this? I'm a bit worried that 10% monthly growth over 6 months could outpace the autoscaler. Maybe we should add some extra capacity upfront to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
7 months ago
I'm pretty confident that c and d are the right answer here. Tracking the coverage of requirements and monitoring defect trends are key quality metrics. The other options don't seem as useful.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel