New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM CLSSYB-001 Exam - Topic 5 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CLSSYB-001 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 5
[All CLSSYB-001 Questions]

An important factor in a viable _________ is to determine who, when and to what level various personnel must be trained to maintain the improvements made to a process.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Dalene at Jul 22, 2022, 01:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CLSSYB-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kristeen
4 months ago
Process Map? Nah, that doesn’t fit at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure it’s not FMEA? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
4 months ago
Agreed, Control Plan makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
4 months ago
I think it’s more about Standard Operating Procedures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
4 months ago
Definitely a Control Plan! Training is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards Process Map, but I can't recall if it really addresses training levels like the question suggests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
5 months ago
Standard Operating Procedure sounds familiar, but I feel like it’s more about documenting processes rather than training specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question about FMEA, but it was more about risk assessment than training personnel.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
5 months ago
I think the answer might be Control Plan since it focuses on maintaining process improvements, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
5 months ago
I think the key here is to look at the error message and try to identify the root cause. The error seems to indicate an issue with the Backint agent, so I'd start by checking the permissions on the agent binary and launcher script as suggested in option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
5 months ago
I think the method used here is probably pxGrid, as it relates to policy enforcement in ISE, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B, db.collection.reIndex({author:l}). That sounds like the right command to rebuild the indexes on a collection.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel