MENU
The following Business Case is constructed properly. ''During fiscal year 2008 the warranty returns for electric razor Model 312 were 1.3%. This represents a gap of 0.5% over target costing the company $18,500 per month.''
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CLSSGB-001 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
DO
Dong
12 months ago
True, but how does that compare to industry standards?
LA
Lachelle
12 months ago
Wait, $18,500 a month? That sounds off.
RH
Rhea
12 months ago
Seems like a costly issue for the company.
AR
Aron
1 year ago
Agree, 0.5% over target is concerning.
FR
Francesco
1 year ago
Warranty returns were 1.3%, that's pretty high.
HE
Herman
1 year ago
I can't recall if a 1.3% return rate is typical for electric razors. Should I lean towards true or false?
CR
Cristy
1 year ago
I feel like the wording is a bit tricky. Is the 0.5% gap really a problem if the costs are manageable?
EL
Eladia
1 year ago
This seems similar to a practice question we did on target costing. I think the gap should be evaluated against industry standards.
MI
Micaela
1 year ago
I remember discussing warranty returns in class, but I'm not sure if 1.3% is considered a significant gap.
KE
Keith
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The options cover a range of potential benefits, so I'm not sure which one is considered the "main" benefit. I'll have to review my notes on Cloud RAN to make sure I understand the core advantages.
RI
Ria
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the different alert levels here. Is "Low" the least serious, and "Severe" the most serious? I want to make sure I understand how these work before I commit to an answer.
VI
Vincenza
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Adding more examples seems like a good idea, but I'm not sure if that's the most effective way to decrease false positives. Maybe enabling active learning could be a better option?
CH
Christene
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to really think through the plug-in execution order and how that might impact the timeout issue.