GAQM CLSSGB-001 Exam - Topic 1 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CLSSGB-001 exam

Question #: 19
Topic #: 1

The following Business Case is constructed properly. ''During fiscal year 2008 the warranty returns for electric razor Model 312 were 1.3%. This represents a gap of 0.5% over target costing the company $18,500 per month.''

ATrue

BFalse

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Izetta at Aug 19, 2022, 07:49 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CLSSGB-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dong

4 months ago

True, but how does that compare to industry standards?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lachelle

4 months ago

Wait, $18,500 a month? That sounds off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rhea

4 months ago

Seems like a costly issue for the company.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aron

4 months ago

Agree, 0.5% over target is concerning.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francesco

4 months ago

Warranty returns were 1.3%, that's pretty high.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herman

5 months ago

I can't recall if a 1.3% return rate is typical for electric razors. Should I lean towards true or false?

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristy

5 months ago

I feel like the wording is a bit tricky. Is the 0.5% gap really a problem if the costs are manageable?

upvoted 0 times

...

Eladia

5 months ago

This seems similar to a practice question we did on target costing. I think the gap should be evaluated against industry standards.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micaela

5 months ago

I remember discussing warranty returns in class, but I'm not sure if 1.3% is considered a significant gap.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keith

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. The options cover a range of potential benefits, so I'm not sure which one is considered the "main" benefit. I'll have to review my notes on Cloud RAN to make sure I understand the core advantages.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ria

5 months ago

I'm a little confused by the different alert levels here. Is "Low" the least serious, and "Severe" the most serious? I want to make sure I understand how these work before I commit to an answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vincenza

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Adding more examples seems like a good idea, but I'm not sure if that's the most effective way to decrease false positives. Maybe enabling active learning could be a better option?

upvoted 0 times

...

Christene

5 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to really think through the plug-in execution order and how that might impact the timeout issue.

upvoted 0 times

...