Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GAQM CLSSBB-001 Exam - Topic 4 Question 21 Discussion

Posted by Natalie on Dec 12, 2022 at 10:32 AM

Which statement(s) are incorrect about Fractional Factorial Designs?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium CLSSBB-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
IR
Iraida 12 months ago
Resolution V is definitely the way to go for cost control!
RO
Rosalind 12 months ago
I thought Quarter Fractional designs were only for 3 factors, not 4.
CA
Catarina 12 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that? Sounds a bit off.
FE
Felicidad 1 year ago
Totally agree, they are the same in this case!
RO
Ronna 1 year ago
A Half Fractional Design for 5 factors has 16 runs, while Full Factorial for 4 has 16 too.
EL
Eleonora 1 year ago
D seems right to me because I remember that with only 2 factors, you can't really have a half fractional design, but I need to double-check that.
MA
Markus 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about C; I thought Resolution V was good for cost control, but I can't remember if it's always the best choice.
DE
Demetra 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question about fractional designs, and I feel like B could be correct since I recall that quarter fractional designs are possible with 4 factors.
YU
Yuette 1 year ago
I think A might be incorrect because I remember that a half fractional design reduces the number of runs compared to a full factorial, but I'm not sure about the specifics with 5 and 4 factors.
DA
Dalene 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the details of the different constraints and controls to figure out the most proactive and least operationally intensive approach.
MY
Myra 1 year ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of the cyber-attack lifecycle. I'll carefully analyze the diagram and the options to determine the stage where the attacker can run malicious code against the target machine.
LA
Larue 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The ROE should include things like the cost of the assessment, report distribution guidelines, any testing restrictions, and liability information. I'm confident I can select the right answer here.
LA
Lashawna 1 year ago
I'm just glad I don't have to run all those extra experiments. I'd rather be at the beach than in a lab!
BO
Boris 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lashawna
User 3: I agree, it's great to be able to control costs and still get valuable data.
WI
Wilson 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lashawna
User 2: Yeah, but with Fractional Factorial Designs, we can save time and resources.
DO
Dorothea 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lashawna
User 1: I know, running all those experiments can be exhausting.
DE
Delbert 1 year ago
Wait, we're designing experiments now? I thought this was a cooking class. Can we talk about fractional cakes instead?
SH
Sharee 1 year ago
D is incorrect. Half Fractional experiments do exist for designs with 2 factors, as long as the design is properly constructed.
OZ
Ozell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sharee
D) Half Fractional experiments do not exist for those designs with only 2 factors
VA
Vanesa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sharee
C) Resolution V design is desired while controlling costs of experimentation
DE
Dewitt 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sharee
B) Quarter Fractional experiments can exist for those with 4 factors
FE
Felix 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sharee
A) A Half Fractional Design for 5 factors has the same number of experimental runs as a Full Factorial Design for 4 factors assuming no repeats or replicates or Center Points
AB
Abel 1 year ago
C is definitely correct. Resolution V designs are preferred when trying to control the costs of experimentation.
RO
Ronny 1 year ago
↳ replying to Abel
C) Resolution V design is desired while controlling costs of experimentation
TH
Theron 1 year ago
↳ replying to Abel
B) Quarter Fractional experiments can exist for those with 4 factors
ME
Melissa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Abel
A) A Half Fractional Design for 5 factors has the same number of experimental runs as a Full Factorial Design for 4 factors assuming no repeats or replicates or Center Points
JE
Jenelle 2 years ago
B is correct. Quarter Fractional experiments can exist for designs with 4 factors, as long as the design is properly constructed.
SH
Shonda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jenelle
C) Resolution V design is desired while controlling costs of experimentation
BE
Bernardine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jenelle
B) Quarter Fractional experiments can exist for those with 4 factors
DE
Desmond 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jenelle
A) A Half Fractional Design for 5 factors has the same number of experimental runs as a Full Factorial Design for 4 factors assuming no repeats or replicates or Center Points
HI
Hillary 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jenelle
C) Resolution V design is desired while controlling costs of experimentation
BE
Bettina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jenelle
B) Quarter Fractional experiments can exist for those with 4 factors
LE
Lenora 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jenelle
A) A Half Fractional Design for 5 factors has the same number of experimental runs as a Full Factorial Design for 4 factors assuming no repeats or replicates or Center Points
DE
Deandrea 2 years ago
Option A seems incorrect. A Half Fractional Design for 5 factors would have fewer experimental runs than a Full Factorial Design for 4 factors.
WI
Wilda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Deandrea
Quarter Fractional experiments can exist for those with 4 factors, so Option B is correct.
WI
Wilda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Deandrea
That's right, Option A is incorrect. A Half Fractional Design for 5 factors would have fewer runs than a Full Factorial Design for 4 factors.
AN
An 2 years ago
I believe statement D is also incorrect because Half Fractional experiments can exist for designs with 2 factors.
MI
Micaela 2 years ago
I agree, A doesn't make sense because Half Fractional Designs have fewer runs than Full Factorial Designs.
AL
Alaine 2 years ago
I think statement A is incorrect.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel