New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM CLSSBB-001 Exam - Topic 4 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CLSSBB-001 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 4
[All CLSSBB-001 Questions]

Which statement(s) are incorrect about Fractional Factorial Designs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Natalie at Dec 12, 2022, 10:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CLSSBB-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Iraida
4 months ago
Resolution V is definitely the way to go for cost control!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
4 months ago
I thought Quarter Fractional designs were only for 3 factors, not 4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
4 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that? Sounds a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
4 months ago
Totally agree, they are the same in this case!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
4 months ago
A Half Fractional Design for 5 factors has 16 runs, while Full Factorial for 4 has 16 too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
5 months ago
D seems right to me because I remember that with only 2 factors, you can't really have a half fractional design, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about C; I thought Resolution V was good for cost control, but I can't remember if it's always the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question about fractional designs, and I feel like B could be correct since I recall that quarter fractional designs are possible with 4 factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
5 months ago
I think A might be incorrect because I remember that a half fractional design reduces the number of runs compared to a full factorial, but I'm not sure about the specifics with 5 and 4 factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the details of the different constraints and controls to figure out the most proactive and least operationally intensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
5 months ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of the cyber-attack lifecycle. I'll carefully analyze the diagram and the options to determine the stage where the attacker can run malicious code against the target machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The ROE should include things like the cost of the assessment, report distribution guidelines, any testing restrictions, and liability information. I'm confident I can select the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
9 months ago
I'm just glad I don't have to run all those extra experiments. I'd rather be at the beach than in a lab!
upvoted 0 times
Boris
8 months ago
User 3: I agree, it's great to be able to control costs and still get valuable data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
8 months ago
User 2: Yeah, but with Fractional Factorial Designs, we can save time and resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothea
8 months ago
User 1: I know, running all those experiments can be exhausting.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delbert
9 months ago
Wait, we're designing experiments now? I thought this was a cooking class. Can we talk about fractional cakes instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
9 months ago
D is incorrect. Half Fractional experiments do exist for designs with 2 factors, as long as the design is properly constructed.
upvoted 0 times
Ozell
8 months ago
D) Half Fractional experiments do not exist for those designs with only 2 factors
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
8 months ago
C) Resolution V design is desired while controlling costs of experimentation
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
8 months ago
B) Quarter Fractional experiments can exist for those with 4 factors
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
9 months ago
A) A Half Fractional Design for 5 factors has the same number of experimental runs as a Full Factorial Design for 4 factors assuming no repeats or replicates or Center Points
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Abel
9 months ago
C is definitely correct. Resolution V designs are preferred when trying to control the costs of experimentation.
upvoted 0 times
Ronny
8 months ago
C) Resolution V design is desired while controlling costs of experimentation
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
8 months ago
B) Quarter Fractional experiments can exist for those with 4 factors
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
9 months ago
A) A Half Fractional Design for 5 factors has the same number of experimental runs as a Full Factorial Design for 4 factors assuming no repeats or replicates or Center Points
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jenelle
10 months ago
B is correct. Quarter Fractional experiments can exist for designs with 4 factors, as long as the design is properly constructed.
upvoted 0 times
Shonda
9 months ago
C) Resolution V design is desired while controlling costs of experimentation
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
9 months ago
B) Quarter Fractional experiments can exist for those with 4 factors
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
9 months ago
A) A Half Fractional Design for 5 factors has the same number of experimental runs as a Full Factorial Design for 4 factors assuming no repeats or replicates or Center Points
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
9 months ago
C) Resolution V design is desired while controlling costs of experimentation
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
10 months ago
B) Quarter Fractional experiments can exist for those with 4 factors
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
10 months ago
A) A Half Fractional Design for 5 factors has the same number of experimental runs as a Full Factorial Design for 4 factors assuming no repeats or replicates or Center Points
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deandrea
10 months ago
Option A seems incorrect. A Half Fractional Design for 5 factors would have fewer experimental runs than a Full Factorial Design for 4 factors.
upvoted 0 times
Wilda
9 months ago
Quarter Fractional experiments can exist for those with 4 factors, so Option B is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
10 months ago
That's right, Option A is incorrect. A Half Fractional Design for 5 factors would have fewer runs than a Full Factorial Design for 4 factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
An
11 months ago
I believe statement D is also incorrect because Half Fractional experiments can exist for designs with 2 factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
11 months ago
I agree, A doesn't make sense because Half Fractional Designs have fewer runs than Full Factorial Designs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
11 months ago
I think statement A is incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel