Discuss GAQM CITM-001 Exam Topic 3 Question 14

Which strategy is helpful in seeking global efficiency while retaining local responsiveness?

ATransitional Strategy

BRisk Strategy

CMultinational Strategy

DInternational Strategy

Suggested Answer: A

A transitional strategy is helpful in seeking global efficiency while retaining local responsiveness because it combines the benefits of both standardization and adaptation. A transitional strategy aims to achieve high levels of global integration and local responsiveness by leveraging the interdependence and learning among different units of the organization.A transitional strategy requires a complex and flexible organizational structure, a strong global culture, and effective coordination and communication mechanisms12.Reference:1: CITM Study Guide, Chapter 4: Global IT Strategy2: Balancing Global Synergies and Local Responsiveness | SpringerLink

Get Premium CITM-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

32 comments · newest first

Ryan 10 months ago

Really? I’m not sure if Transitional is the best choice.

Chantay 10 months ago

Totally agree, it balances both needs!

Twana 11 months ago

Surprised that International Strategy is even an option here!

Helene 11 months ago

Multinational Strategy seems outdated for this.

Dudley 11 months ago

I think the Transitional Strategy is the way to go.

Madalyn 11 months ago

I'm leaning towards the transitional strategy too. It seems to be the one that allows for both global integration and local adaptation.

Anisha 12 months ago

I keep mixing up international and multinational strategies. I feel like one of them could be the answer, but I can't recall the differences clearly.

Jettie 12 months ago

I remember practicing a question about multinational strategies, but I don't think that's the best fit here.

Verona 12 months ago

I think the transitional strategy might be the right answer since it balances global efficiency and local needs, but I'm not entirely sure.

Gennie 1 year ago

Okay, I've got it! A multinational strategy is the way to go. It allows for global coordination while still giving local units the flexibility to respond to their markets.

Marica 1 year ago

Ah, I think the key here is finding a strategy that balances global and local considerations. Let me see if I can eliminate the options that don't fit that criteria.

Leatha 1 year ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review my notes on global and local strategies to figure out which one best fits the description.

Becky 1 year ago

This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between the strategies and how they relate to global efficiency and local responsiveness.

Svetlana 1 year ago

The Multinational Strategy is the clear winner here. I mean, who doesn't want to be a global powerhouse with a local touch? Sign me up!

Hillary 1 year ago

Hmm, the Transitional Strategy seems a bit risky to me. I prefer something more tried and true, like the Multinational approach.

Rory 1 year ago

↳ replying to Hillary

I prefer the International Strategy for a good balance between global efficiency and local responsiveness.

Arlie 1 year ago

↳ replying to Hillary

I see your point, but I still think the Multinational Strategy is the way to go.

Yolande 1 year ago

↳ replying to Hillary

I think the Transitional Strategy could be worth considering for faster results.

Lajuana 1 year ago

↳ replying to Hillary

I agree, the Multinational Strategy is a safer bet.

Nydia 1 year ago

Definitely the Multinational Strategy. Who doesn't love a little bit of global and local in their business strategy? It's like fusion cuisine for the corporate world!

Sylvia 1 year ago

The International Strategy seems like the best option to me. It provides the right balance between global and local needs.

Alyce 1 year ago

↳ replying to Sylvia

User 3: I agree with Alyce, the International Strategy seems like the best option.

Hubert 1 year ago

↳ replying to Sylvia

User 2: I disagree, I believe the International Strategy is more balanced.

Bette 1 year ago

↳ replying to Sylvia

User 1: I think the Multinational Strategy is the way to go.

Ryan 1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think D) International Strategy could also be a good option.

Carmen 1 year ago

I agree with Franchesca, Multinational Strategy allows for both global efficiency and local responsiveness.

Franchesca 1 year ago

I think the answer is C) Multinational Strategy.

Paris 1 year ago

I think the Multinational Strategy is the way to go. It allows for local responsiveness while still maintaining global efficiency.

Domitila 1 year ago

↳ replying to Paris

I believe the Risk Strategy could be risky but effective in achieving both global efficiency and local responsiveness.

Whitley 1 year ago

↳ replying to Paris

I prefer the International Strategy because it focuses more on global efficiency.

Hoa 1 year ago

↳ replying to Paris

I think the Transitional Strategy could also work well in balancing global efficiency and local responsiveness.

Novella 1 year ago

↳ replying to Paris

I agree, the Multinational Strategy seems like the best option.

GAQM CITM-001 Exam - Topic 3 Question 14 Discussion