Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM CITM-001 Exam - Topic 3 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CITM-001 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 3
[All CITM-001 Questions]

Which strategy is helpful in seeking global efficiency while retaining local responsiveness?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

A transitional strategy is helpful in seeking global efficiency while retaining local responsiveness because it combines the benefits of both standardization and adaptation. A transitional strategy aims to achieve high levels of global integration and local responsiveness by leveraging the interdependence and learning among different units of the organization.A transitional strategy requires a complex and flexible organizational structure, a strong global culture, and effective coordination and communication mechanisms12.Reference:1: CITM Study Guide, Chapter 4: Global IT Strategy2: Balancing Global Synergies and Local Responsiveness | SpringerLink


by Paola at Apr 30, 2025, 01:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CITM-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ryan
5 months ago
Really? I’m not sure if Transitional is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
5 months ago
Totally agree, it balances both needs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
6 months ago
Surprised that International Strategy is even an option here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
6 months ago
Multinational Strategy seems outdated for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dudley
6 months ago
I think the Transitional Strategy is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards the transitional strategy too. It seems to be the one that allows for both global integration and local adaptation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
7 months ago
I keep mixing up international and multinational strategies. I feel like one of them could be the answer, but I can't recall the differences clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
7 months ago
I remember practicing a question about multinational strategies, but I don't think that's the best fit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
7 months ago
I think the transitional strategy might be the right answer since it balances global efficiency and local needs, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gennie
7 months ago
Okay, I've got it! A multinational strategy is the way to go. It allows for global coordination while still giving local units the flexibility to respond to their markets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
7 months ago
Ah, I think the key here is finding a strategy that balances global and local considerations. Let me see if I can eliminate the options that don't fit that criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review my notes on global and local strategies to figure out which one best fits the description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
8 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between the strategies and how they relate to global efficiency and local responsiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
11 months ago
The Multinational Strategy is the clear winner here. I mean, who doesn't want to be a global powerhouse with a local touch? Sign me up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
11 months ago
Hmm, the Transitional Strategy seems a bit risky to me. I prefer something more tried and true, like the Multinational approach.
upvoted 0 times
Rory
11 months ago
I prefer the International Strategy for a good balance between global efficiency and local responsiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
11 months ago
I see your point, but I still think the Multinational Strategy is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
11 months ago
I think the Transitional Strategy could be worth considering for faster results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
11 months ago
I agree, the Multinational Strategy is a safer bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nydia
11 months ago
Definitely the Multinational Strategy. Who doesn't love a little bit of global and local in their business strategy? It's like fusion cuisine for the corporate world!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
12 months ago
The International Strategy seems like the best option to me. It provides the right balance between global and local needs.
upvoted 0 times
Alyce
11 months ago
User 3: I agree with Alyce, the International Strategy seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
11 months ago
User 2: I disagree, I believe the International Strategy is more balanced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
11 months ago
User 1: I think the Multinational Strategy is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ryan
12 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) International Strategy could also be a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
1 year ago
I agree with Franchesca, Multinational Strategy allows for both global efficiency and local responsiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) Multinational Strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
1 year ago
I think the Multinational Strategy is the way to go. It allows for local responsiveness while still maintaining global efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
Domitila
11 months ago
I believe the Risk Strategy could be risky but effective in achieving both global efficiency and local responsiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
11 months ago
I prefer the International Strategy because it focuses more on global efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
11 months ago
I think the Transitional Strategy could also work well in balancing global efficiency and local responsiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
11 months ago
I agree, the Multinational Strategy seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel