Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM CCCP-001 Exam - Topic 9 Question 103 Discussion

A company is required to provide their customers with zero downtime for its web application. Which of the following would satisfy this requirement?
C) Multipathing
A) Cold site
B) High availability
D) Load balancing

GAQM CCCP-001 Exam - Topic 9 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CCCP-001 exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 9
[All CCCP-001 Questions]

A company is required to provide their customers with zero downtime for its web application. Which of the following would satisfy this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Jesus at Mar 07, 2025, 11:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCCP-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Peggy
7 months ago
Multipathing is useful, but not the main solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
8 months ago
Wait, can you really achieve zero downtime? Sounds tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelia
8 months ago
Load balancing is super important too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
8 months ago
Cold site won't cut it for zero downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
8 months ago
High availability is definitely the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
9 months ago
Multipathing might help with redundancy, but I don't think it directly addresses zero downtime like high availability does.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
9 months ago
Cold sites seem like they would take too long to activate, so I doubt that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about load balancing helping with uptime too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
9 months ago
I think high availability is the best choice here since it focuses on minimizing downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
9 months ago
B is the way to go. High availability with redundant systems and automatic failover is the industry standard for mission-critical applications that can't afford any downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
9 months ago
I'm a little confused by the options. Multipathing and load balancing both sound like they could help with uptime, but I'm not sure if they fully satisfy the "zero downtime" requirement. I'll have to weigh the pros and cons of each choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
9 months ago
Definitely B. High availability is the key to providing continuous uptime for critical systems like a web app. I feel confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Maybe I should review my notes on high availability and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
9 months ago
I think the answer is B. High availability seems like the best way to ensure zero downtime for a web application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
1 year ago
Maybe they should just throw a unicorn at the problem. That would probably give them zero downtime too, right?
upvoted 0 times
Wenona
1 year ago
C: Yeah, high availability is key for zero downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
1 year ago
B: Haha, that would be interesting. But I think high availability would be a better solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
1 year ago
A: I wish throwing a unicorn at the problem would work!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dannette
1 year ago
A cold site? For zero downtime? Seriously? Whoever wrote this question must be living in the Stone Age.
upvoted 0 times
Anglea
1 year ago
Multipathing is another good choice to satisfy the requirement of zero downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
1 year ago
Load balancing can also help ensure zero downtime for the web application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
1 year ago
High availability would be the best option for zero downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hannah
1 year ago
Multipathing? Really? That doesn't seem like it would provide zero downtime. Guess I'll have to think harder on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Corinne
1 year ago
C: Cold site wouldn't be the best choice for zero downtime, you're right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
1 year ago
B: Load balancing could also help ensure continuous service for customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
1 year ago
A: High availability would be the best option for zero downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jacki
1 year ago
Load balancing seems like a pretty solid option too. I'd be surprised if that's not the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
Charlene
1 year ago
Multipathing might also be a good option to ensure redundancy and reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
1 year ago
Load balancing could also help distribute the traffic and prevent downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 year ago
I agree, high availability ensures continuous operation without interruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
1 year ago
I think high availability would be the best choice for zero downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorean
1 year ago
I'm not sure. Can someone explain why High availability is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
1 year ago
High availability definitely sounds like the way to go for zero downtime. I bet that's the correct answer!
upvoted 0 times
Lettie
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, it ensures that the web application is always accessible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, high availability is the best option for zero downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mike
1 year ago
I agree with Lauran. High availability ensures zero downtime for the web application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) High availability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel