New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GAQM CCCP-001 Exam - Topic 3 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CCCP-001 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 3
[All CCCP-001 Questions]

Which of the following access control methods could allow for a network user to sign onto their corporate network and their supplier's network portal without having to enter their ID and password more than once?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Yvonne
3 months ago
I disagree, I thought mandatory access control was more secure for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
3 months ago
I’m surprised this is even a question, federated access is pretty standard now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure it’s not C? Role-based can also streamline access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
4 months ago
Totally agree, D makes the most sense here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
4 months ago
I think D is the right answer, federated access control is all about single sign-on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
4 months ago
Mandatory access control seems too strict for this situation; I feel like federated access control is the best fit for seamless access across networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I believe discretionary access control is more about individual user permissions, so it probably wouldn't fit this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eva
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about role-based access control being more about permissions based on job roles rather than single sign-on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
5 months ago
I think federated access control might be the right answer since it allows users to access multiple systems with a single login.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
5 months ago
Federated access control is definitely the way to go. It's designed for this exact use case of allowing users to access multiple networks with a single set of credentials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
5 months ago
Role-based access control could work, but I'm not sure if that would allow for single sign-on across networks. I'll have to consider the other options as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the differences between the access control methods. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand this properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
5 months ago
Federated access control sounds like the right approach here. I'm pretty confident that's the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different access control methods carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the CIMA expects certain personal qualities, but I can't quite remember what they all are. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlie
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The online check-in banner message is configured in the Service Portal > Check-in > Settings, so the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
5 months ago
Honestly, I'm torn between SNMP and DNS; I feel like I practiced questions similar to this, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
10 months ago
Federated access control is the way to go, but I hope it's not as confusing as a federated soccer league. Gotta keep it simple, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Jaleesa
8 months ago
Federated access control allows for single sign-on across multiple networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
9 months ago
D) Federated access control
upvoted 0 times
...
Chara
9 months ago
I agree, it's much more convenient for users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
9 months ago
C) Role-based access control
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
9 months ago
Federated access control allows for single sign-on across multiple networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
9 months ago
B) Mandatory access control
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
9 months ago
D) Federated access control
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
9 months ago
C) Role-based access control
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
10 months ago
A) Discretionary access control
upvoted 0 times
...
Chu
10 months ago
B) Mandatory access control
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
10 months ago
A) Discretionary access control
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cory
10 months ago
Discretionary access control? More like 'Discretionary Disaster Control,' am I right? Let's go with the federated option!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
10 months ago
Hmm, mandatory access control might be overkill for this situation. Seems a bit too restrictive, if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Role-based access control could also potentially allow for single sign-on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
10 months ago
I agree with Caprice, Federated access control allows for single sign-on to multiple networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards role-based access control. Seems more secure than just letting anyone in, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Anastacia
9 months ago
Discretionary access control could work too, but it may not be as efficient for accessing multiple networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
9 months ago
Role-based access control is also a good option, it provides specific permissions based on the user's role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
10 months ago
I agree, federated access control is convenient for users who need to access multiple networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
10 months ago
I think federated access control is the way to go. It allows for seamless access across multiple networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlton
11 months ago
Federated access control is definitely the way to go here! Sign in once and access all your network resources, that's the dream!
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
11 months ago
I think the answer is D) Federated access control.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel