Which of the following would BEST be managed with the "keep satisfied" stakeholder management strategy?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CBAF-001 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
AL
Alton
11 months ago
C seems like a good option too, they might get involved if engaged.
PE
Pearlie
11 months ago
I agree with B too, they have the power to influence outcomes.
GE
Georgene
11 months ago
Wait, how can you keep someone satisfied if they have no interest?
AZ
Azalee
12 months ago
I think A is the right choice. They don't care much anyway.
MA
Matt
12 months ago
Definitely B! They need to be kept happy.
SU
Sueann
12 months ago
I feel like C could also fit since they have high interest, but I’m confused about the power aspect. I need to review that part again.
NI
Nicolette
1 year ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think it was about keeping those with high power engaged, so B might be the right choice.
TO
Toi
1 year ago
I remember something about managing stakeholders with high power and some interest, which sounds like B. But I’m not entirely sure.
CH
Cherrie
1 year ago
I think "keep satisfied" is for stakeholders who have high power but maybe not a lot of interest. So, I’m leaning towards A.
JU
Justine
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree with Gabriele. Option A seems like the clear choice for the "keep satisfied" strategy. The others have either too much interest or not enough power/influence.
GA
Gabriele
1 year ago
I think option A is the way to go here. Those with high power/influence but no interest in the project are exactly the kind of stakeholders you'd want to "keep satisfied" so they don't cause any issues.
DA
Dalene
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The "keep satisfied" strategy is supposed to be for high power/influence, low interest stakeholders, but some of these options have high interest as well. Not sure which one is the best fit.
RA
Rana
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The "keep satisfied" strategy is for stakeholders with high power/influence but low interest, right? So I'd say option A is the best fit for that.
RU
Rusty
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different stakeholder management strategies and how they apply to the options given.
WI
Winfred
1 year ago
D) Those with some power/influence and some interest in the project. Gotta spread the love, you know? Can't play favorites, even if it's tempting to just focus on the big shots.
RE
Rebbeca
1 year ago
C) Those with some power/influence and high interest in the project.
RO
Rolande
1 year ago
B) Those with high power/influence and some interest in the project.
KI
Kiera
1 year ago
A) Those with high power/influence and no interest in the project.
MA
Malinda
2 years ago
This is a tough one, but I'm going with B. Keeping the big shots happy is key, even if they're not super invested. Hey, at least they can't fire us, right? *wink wink*
RA
Ranee
1 year ago
User 2: Ranee is right, we need to focus on those with high power/influence.
AN
Andree
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, keeping the powerful stakeholders satisfied is important.
LO
Loreta
2 years ago
I'm torn between B and C, but I think B is the best answer. You don't want to neglect the high-powered stakeholders, even if they're not super interested.
CA
Camellia
2 years ago
B) Those with high power/influence and some interest in the project. Seems like the obvious choice to keep satisfied.
LA
Lashunda
1 year ago
D) Those with some power/influence and some interest in the project.
TA
Tammara
1 year ago
C) Those with some power/influence and high interest in the project.
SH
Shonda
1 year ago
B) Those with high power/influence and some interest in the project.
KR
Krissy
1 year ago
A) Those with high power/influence and no interest in the project.
PO
Polly
2 years ago
But what about those with high power/influence and no interest? Shouldn't we also keep them satisfied to avoid any potential issues?
GL
Glen
2 years ago
I agree with Isreal. It's important to prioritize stakeholders who can have a big impact on the project.
IS
Isreal
2 years ago
I think the best strategy is to keep satisfied those with high power/influence and some interest in the project.