MENU
A stakeholder in a project has been classified as having no interest but high power/influence on the power/interest grid. Which of the following would be an appropriate way of managing this stakeholder?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CBAF-001 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
CH
Chi
11 months ago
Wait, why would we ignore someone with high power? That sounds off.
MA
Marleen
11 months ago
Watching them might be enough, but I’d lean towards keeping onside.
KA
Karima
11 months ago
Not sure about ignoring them... seems risky.
MA
Martin
12 months ago
Definitely agree with option D!
SA
Samira
12 months ago
I think keeping them informed is key.
JU
Juan
12 months ago
I think keeping them informed is important, but I can't recall if that's the best approach for someone with no interest.
SI
Simona
1 year ago
I feel like ignoring them could be risky since they have high power. Maybe watching them is safer?
SH
Sharen
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where the answer was to keep them onside, but I feel like that might not apply here since they have no interest.
LA
Lashaunda
1 year ago
I think I remember that stakeholders with high power but low interest should be monitored closely, but I'm not sure if that means to keep them informed or just watch them.
LE
Leandro
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards "watch" - if they have low interest, we should just monitor them closely in case their influence or priorities change.
RO
Rosio
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Since the stakeholder has high power but low interest, we need to actively manage them to ensure they don't become a problem. "Keep onside" seems like the best approach.
FR
France
1 year ago
This one seems straightforward - the stakeholder has high power but low interest, so we need to keep them informed and on our side.
CO
Colby
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Is "keep onside" the same as "keep informed"? I'll need to think through the differences between the options.
DE
Devora
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if the formula field would be a good choice or not. Might need to double-check the requirements.
TW
Twana
1 year ago
This is a good test of our understanding of risk management principles. I'll make sure to read the question closely and consider the details before selecting my answer.
SE
Selma
1 year ago
I think the answer is C - stainless steels. They are known to be highly resistant to atmospheric corrosion.
DE
Derick
1 year ago
I'm going with 'watch' - just keep a close eye on that stakeholder, you never know what they might pull.
ME
Meaghan
1 year ago
A: Definitely, it's important to manage all stakeholders effectively.
JO
Jonelle
1 year ago
B: I agree, it's better to keep them updated than to ignore them completely.
CE
Cecil
1 year ago
A: I think 'keep informed' would be a good option, just to make sure they are in the loop.
DE
Delmy
1 year ago
Hmm, 'keep informed' sounds like the right move. Gotta stay on top of that power player's needs.
CA
Carry
1 year ago
Definitely, better to keep them in the loop.
TO
Tonette
1 year ago
Ignoring them could backfire in the long run.
RO
Ronnie
1 year ago
Yeah, they may not show interest now, but they can make or break the project.
WI
Willodean
1 year ago
I agree, keeping them informed is key.
AN
Anisha
2 years ago
Keep onside, for sure. You don't want that stakeholder turning into an active opponent.
MA
Mabel
2 years ago
Wow, this one really tests our project management savvy! Ignoring a high-power stakeholder? Not a chance!
GE
Georgeanna
2 years ago
I disagree, we should just ignore them if they have no interest.
TE
Tegan
2 years ago
I agree with Lacresha, keeping informed is important for managing high power stakeholders.
LA
Lacresha
2 years ago
I think we should keep informed.