Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM CBAF-001 Exam - Topic 3 Question 36 Discussion

A stakeholder in a project has been classified as having no interest but high power/influence on the power/interest grid. Which of the following would be an appropriate way of managing this stakeholder?
A) Ignore.
B) Watch.
C) Keep onside.
D) Keep informed.

GAQM CBAF-001 Exam - Topic 3 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CBAF-001 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 3
[All CBAF-001 Questions]

A stakeholder in a project has been classified as having no interest but high power/influence on the power/interest grid. Which of the following would be an appropriate way of managing this stakeholder?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Marvel at Nov 26, 2023, 10:34 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBAF-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Chi
8 months ago
Wait, why would we ignore someone with high power? That sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
8 months ago
Watching them might be enough, but I’d lean towards keeping onside.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karima
8 months ago
Not sure about ignoring them... seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
8 months ago
Definitely agree with option D!
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
8 months ago
I think keeping them informed is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
9 months ago
I think keeping them informed is important, but I can't recall if that's the best approach for someone with no interest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
9 months ago
I feel like ignoring them could be risky since they have high power. Maybe watching them is safer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the answer was to keep them onside, but I feel like that might not apply here since they have no interest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
9 months ago
I think I remember that stakeholders with high power but low interest should be monitored closely, but I'm not sure if that means to keep them informed or just watch them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards "watch" - if they have low interest, we should just monitor them closely in case their influence or priorities change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Since the stakeholder has high power but low interest, we need to actively manage them to ensure they don't become a problem. "Keep onside" seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
9 months ago
This one seems straightforward - the stakeholder has high power but low interest, so we need to keep them informed and on our side.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Is "keep onside" the same as "keep informed"? I'll need to think through the differences between the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if the formula field would be a good choice or not. Might need to double-check the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
9 months ago
This is a good test of our understanding of risk management principles. I'll make sure to read the question closely and consider the details before selecting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
9 months ago
I think the answer is C - stainless steels. They are known to be highly resistant to atmospheric corrosion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
1 year ago
I'm going with 'watch' - just keep a close eye on that stakeholder, you never know what they might pull.
upvoted 0 times
Meaghan
1 year ago
A: Definitely, it's important to manage all stakeholders effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonelle
1 year ago
B: I agree, it's better to keep them updated than to ignore them completely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
1 year ago
A: I think 'keep informed' would be a good option, just to make sure they are in the loop.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delmy
1 year ago
Hmm, 'keep informed' sounds like the right move. Gotta stay on top of that power player's needs.
upvoted 0 times
Carry
1 year ago
Definitely, better to keep them in the loop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
1 year ago
Ignoring them could backfire in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
1 year ago
Yeah, they may not show interest now, but they can make or break the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 year ago
I agree, keeping them informed is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anisha
1 year ago
Keep onside, for sure. You don't want that stakeholder turning into an active opponent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
1 year ago
Wow, this one really tests our project management savvy! Ignoring a high-power stakeholder? Not a chance!
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
1 year ago
I disagree, we should just ignore them if they have no interest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
1 year ago
I agree with Lacresha, keeping informed is important for managing high power stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
1 year ago
I think we should keep informed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel