Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM CBAF-001 Exam - Topic 1 Question 86 Discussion

A business analyst has identified that one of the use cases on a use case diagram contains a large amount of optional processing. This optional processing is so large that he has decided to remove it to a separate use case which can be called by the original use case if required. How should the original use case be linked to the new use case?
D) By a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word extend.
A) By a broken, arrowed line stereotypedwith the word include.
B) By a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word uses.
C) By a solid line with no arrowhead or stereotype.

GAQM CBAF-001 Exam - Topic 1 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CBAF-001 exam
Question #: 86
Topic #: 1
[All CBAF-001 Questions]

A business analyst has identified that one of the use cases on a use case diagram contains a large amount of optional processing. This optional processing is so large that he has decided to remove it to a separate use case which can be called by the original use case if required. How should the original use case be linked to the new use case?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Johana at May 30, 2026, 09:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBAF-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Queen
4 days ago
It should be linked with "extend."
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
10 days ago
I thought "uses" was a term we learned, but I can't recall if it's the same as "include." This is tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
15 days ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to decide between "include" and "extend." I feel like "include" fits better here since the new use case is a part of the original.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
20 days ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about "extend" being used for optional behavior. Maybe that's the right answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
25 days ago
I think the original use case should link to the new one with an "include" relationship since it's optional processing that can be called when needed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel