New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM CASPO-001 Exam - Topic 6 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CASPO-001 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 6
[All CASPO-001 Questions]

As the Sprint Planning meeting progresses, the Developers see that the workload is greater than they can handle. Which two are valid actions? (Choose the best two answers)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

The Scrum Guide allows the Sprint Backlog to be adjusted during Sprint Planning if the Developers realize the scope exceeds capacity: 'If the work turns out to be different than they expected, they collaborate with the Product Owner to negotiate the scope of the Sprint Backlog within the Sprint.'

D: Removing or changing items is valid to align with capacity while preserving the Sprint Goal.

E: Informing the Product Owner, starting the Sprint, and monitoring progress reflects collaboration and adaptability, keeping the Sprint on track.

Option A (overtime) contradicts Scrum's sustainable pace principle. Option B (recruiting) isn't feasible mid-planning and disrupts team stability. Option C (canceling) is an extreme measure only the Product Owner can initiate, not the Developers, and only for specific reasons (e.g., Sprint Goal obsolescence). Thus, D and E are valid.


by Laurel at Jul 08, 2025, 11:12 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CASPO-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Naomi
2 months ago
A is not a good idea, overtime just leads to burnout.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
2 months ago
Totally agree with D! Changing backlog items makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
2 months ago
I think D and E are the best options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
3 months ago
Wait, can they really cancel the Sprint? That seems extreme!
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
3 months ago
B is unrealistic, we can't just recruit on the fly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
3 months ago
I'm not sure about canceling the Sprint, but I guess it could be a last resort if things are really unmanageable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
3 months ago
I think removing or changing backlog items could be a valid action. It seems like a common practice in similar scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
4 months ago
I feel like recruiting new Developers would take too long, so that might not be practical either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
4 months ago
I remember discussing how overtime isn't a sustainable solution, so I think that's definitely not an option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
4 months ago
Recruiting additional Developers is a good idea, but it might not be feasible in the short term. Removing or changing Backlog items seems like the most practical solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
4 months ago
Canceling the Sprint seems like a last resort option. I'd want to explore other ways to address the workload issue first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominic
4 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to focus on transparency and collaboration with the Product Owner to adjust the Sprint plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
5 months ago
Hmm, the workload being greater than the Developers can handle is a tricky situation. I'll need to carefully consider the valid actions based on Scrum best practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the Scrum principles correctly before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
6 months ago
I'm with Herschel on this one. Who works overtime these days? D and E for the win!
upvoted 0 times
Ira
5 months ago
Yeah, I think adjusting the Product Backlog items and keeping the Product Owner informed is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
5 months ago
I agree, working overtime is not sustainable. Let's go with D and E.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herschel
7 months ago
Haha, working overtime? What is this, the 80s? D and E are clearly the way to go. Get real, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Vilma
5 months ago
Yeah, working overtime is not sustainable. D) Remove or change selected Product Backlog items.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charlesetta
7 months ago
I agree, D and E are the way to go. No point in overworking the team or scrapping the whole plan.
upvoted 0 times
Samira
5 months ago
Agreed, it's important to adjust the plan rather than overworking the team or cancelling the Sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
5 months ago
E) The Developers ensure that the Product Owner is aware, start the Sprint, and monitor progress.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
7 months ago
D) Remove or change selected Product Backlog items.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elbert
7 months ago
In that case, we should make sure the Product Owner is aware and monitor progress closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
7 months ago
Definitely go with D and E. Overtime and canceling the Sprint are just not sustainable solutions.
upvoted 0 times
Darell
7 months ago
Yeah, overtime and canceling the Sprint are not ideal solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
7 months ago
I agree, D and E are the best options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helene
7 months ago
But what if the Product Owner is not willing to make changes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
8 months ago
I agree with Elbert. It's important to prioritize and adjust the workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
8 months ago
D and E are the best options here. Reducing the workload or getting the Product Owner involved are the most sensible approaches.
upvoted 0 times
Marg
7 months ago
Let's make sure to communicate with the Product Owner and adjust the backlog items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
7 months ago
Agreed, reducing the workload or involving the Product Owner are key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
7 months ago
D and E are the best options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elbert
8 months ago
I think we should remove or change selected Product Backlog items.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel