New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GAQM CASPO-001 Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CASPO-001 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All CASPO-001 Questions]

What happens if the customer no longer wants the feature that the Sprint Goal intended to meet? (Choose the best answer)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

If the Sprint Goal becomes obsolete (e.g., a feature is no longer needed), the Product Owner can cancel the Sprint. The Scrum Guide states: 'A Sprint can be cancelled if the Sprint Goal becomes obsolete. Only the Product Owner has the authority to cancel the Sprint.'

A: Correct---the Product Owner decides.

B: Stakeholders advise, but don't decide.

C: The Scrum Master lacks this authority.

Exact Extract from Scrum Guide: 'A Sprint can be cancelled if the Sprint Goal becomes obsolete. This might occur if the company changes direction or if market or technology conditions change. Only the Product Owner has the authority to cancel the Sprint.' (Section: 'Sprint Cancellation')

Thus, A is correct.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Suzan
3 days ago
C) The Scrum Master should cancel the Sprint. They're in charge of the Scrum process, so they should make the call.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
8 days ago
B) The executive stakeholders should determine if the Sprint should continue. They have the final say on product decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
14 days ago
A) The Product Owner should cancel the Sprint. That's the right call, as they're responsible for managing the product backlog.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
19 days ago
I feel like this situation is tricky. I remember discussing how the Product Owner prioritizes features, so A could make sense, but what if the stakeholders want to keep going?
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
24 days ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought the Scrum Master was there to facilitate, but I don’t know if they can cancel the Sprint. So maybe A or C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
29 days ago
I remember a practice question about stakeholder involvement, which makes me lean towards B. But I feel like the Scrum Master should have a role in this too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
1 month ago
I think the Product Owner has the final say, so maybe A is correct? But I'm not entirely sure if canceling the Sprint is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
1 month ago
This seems like a good opportunity to apply the Scrum principle of transparency. The team should have an open discussion with the Product Owner and stakeholders to determine the best path forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
1 month ago
I'm leaning towards option B. The executive stakeholders should be involved in deciding whether to continue the Sprint or not, since it impacts the overall product direction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
2 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is that the Sprint Goal is meant to deliver value to the customer. If the customer no longer wants that feature, then the Sprint should probably be reconsidered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know the Product Owner is responsible for the product backlog, but I'm not sure if they can just cancel a Sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the Scrum principles and the Product Owner's role.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel