Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet NSE8_812 Exam - Topic 1 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE8_812 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 1
[All NSE8_812 Questions]

You are creating the CLI script to be used on a new SD-WAN deployment You will have branches with a different number of internet connections and want to be sure there is no need to change the Performance SLA configuration in case more connections are added to the branch.

The current configuration is:

Which configuration do you use for the Performance SLA members?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The set members any option will ensure that all of the SD-WAN interfaces are included in the Performance SLA. This is the best option if you want to be sure that the Performance SLA will be triggered even if more connections are added to the branch in the future.

The set members 0 option will exclude all of the SD-WAN interfaces from the Performance SLA. This is not a good option because it will prevent the Performance SLA from being triggered even if there is a problem with the network.

The current configuration already fulfills the requirement option is incorrect because it does not ensure that all of the SD-WAN interfaces will be included in the Performance SLA.

The set members all option will include all of the SD-WAN interfaces in the Performance SLA, but it is not the best option because it is not scalable. If you have a large number of SD-WAN interfaces, this option will cause the Performance SLA to be triggered too often.

References:

Performance SLA | FortiGate / FortiOS 7.4.0

Configuring Performance SLA | FortiGate / FortiOS 7.4.0


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Gretchen
4 months ago
I’m surprised this is even a question, D feels more logical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
4 months ago
C seems solid, no need to change if it already works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
4 months ago
Wait, why would you choose A? Isn't that too broad?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
4 months ago
Definitely agree with A, it covers all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
5 months ago
I think option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards "set members any" because it sounds like it would adapt well to future changes, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
5 months ago
The current configuration might actually meet the needs without changes, but I feel like I saw a similar question where "set members 0" was mentioned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
5 months ago
I think "set members all" might be the right answer since it ensures all connections are included, but I need to double-check the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
5 months ago
I remember discussing how "set members any" could allow for flexibility with new connections, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
6 months ago
This question seems a bit tricky, but I think I can figure it out if I break it down step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by all the different options here. I'm not sure if a Canvas app is the right solution or if something like AI Builder might be better. I'll have to review the details more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
6 months ago
Object-based storage in a private cloud? That's an interesting one. I'll have to make sure I understand how that differs from the other cloud characteristics mentioned.
upvoted 0 times
...
NSE-478
3 years ago
B is correct
upvoted 1 times
...

Save Cancel