Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_OTS-7.2 Topic 1 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_OTS-7.2 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 1
[All NSE7_OTS-7.2 Questions]

As an OT network administrator, you are managing three FortiGate devices that each protect different levels on the Purdue model. To increase traffic visibility, you are required to implement additional security measures to detect exploits that affect PLCs.

Which security sensor must implement to detect these types of industrial exploits?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Verlene
15 days ago
Hmm, this question reminds me of the time I accidentally triggered the fire alarm at my old job by microwaving a Hot Pocket in the break room. Needless to say, the IPS was not amused.
upvoted 0 times
Keith
2 days ago
User 1: Maybe you should stick to cold sandwiches from now on.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shelba
21 days ago
This is a tough one, but I have to say, the IPS option is the way to go. I mean, who wants their PLCs to become the next target of a nasty industrial exploit? Not me, that's for sure!
upvoted 0 times
User 1: I agree, IPS is definitely the best choice for detecting industrial exploits.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mariko
28 days ago
Application control? Nah, that's more for managing and controlling the applications running on the network. Not really the right tool for detecting industrial exploits. Gotta go with the IPS on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Tish
1 days ago
IPS is specifically designed to detect and prevent those kinds of exploits on PLCs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
2 days ago
Yeah, application control won't cut it for this. IPS is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
19 days ago
IPS is definitely the way to go for detecting those industrial exploits.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carrol
1 months ago
Antivirus? Really? I mean, sure, it can help catch some malware, but it's not really built for the kind of specialized industrial attacks we're talking about. I'd steer clear of that one.
upvoted 0 times
Lajuana
9 days ago
B) Deep packet inspection (DPI)
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
18 days ago
A) Intrusion prevention system (IPS)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmen
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. DPI might be a better option to really dive deep and analyze the traffic for any suspicious activity. Those industrial exploits can be pretty sneaky, you know.
upvoted 0 times
User 3: I agree, those exploits can be tricky to detect without a deep packet inspection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
7 days ago
User 2: Yeah, DPI can really analyze the traffic thoroughly for any suspicious activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
22 days ago
User 1: I think DPI would be the best choice for detecting those industrial exploits.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosalyn
1 months ago
IPS is definitely the way to go here. It's designed to detect and prevent those industrial exploits that target PLCs. Seems like the obvious choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
2 months ago
I believe Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) could also be a good option to increase traffic visibility and detect industrial exploits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
2 months ago
I agree with Luther, IPS can help us detect and prevent exploits that affect PLCs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
2 months ago
I think we should implement an Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) to detect industrial exploits.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel