New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet NSE7_OTS-7.2 Exam - Topic 1 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_OTS-7.2 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 1
[All NSE7_OTS-7.2 Questions]

An OT network architect must deploy a solution to protect fuel pumps in an industrial remote network. All the fuel pumps must be closely monitored from the corporate network for any temperature fluctuations.

How can the OT network architect achieve this goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Rima
3 months ago
Wait, how does a single pattern rule cover all temperature issues?
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
3 months ago
D sounds overkill, why not just keep it simple?
upvoted 0 times
...
Quinn
3 months ago
C is interesting, but can it really handle remote monitoring effectively?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
4 months ago
I think B is better since it keeps the server closer to the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
4 months ago
Option A seems solid for remote monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
4 months ago
I vaguely remember that having both the fuel server and FortiSIEM on the corporate network might not be ideal for remote monitoring, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
4 months ago
I feel like option C makes sense since it mentions monitoring from the corporate network, but I'm a bit confused about the difference between performance and security rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
4 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where the FortiSIEM was deployed on the corporate side, but I can't recall if it was for performance or security rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of monitoring from the corporate network, but I'm not sure if the fuel server should be on the remote network or the corporate one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
5 months ago
I think option A is the way to go. Putting the fuel server on the remote network and the FortiSIEM with the temperature security rule on the corporate network seems like the most logical approach to achieve the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about the placement of the fuel server and FortiSIEM. I'll need to think through the network topology and data flow to make sure I understand the correct configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The fuel server needs to be on the remote network, and the FortiSIEM with the temperature monitoring rule should be on the corporate network. That way, the corporate network can closely monitor the remote fuel pumps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between a "temperature security rule" and a "temperature performance rule" in the FortiSIEM. I'll need to review those details to make sure I select the right option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about remote network monitoring. I think the key is understanding where the fuel server and FortiSIEM should be deployed to achieve the goal of monitoring temperature fluctuations from the corporate network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
5 months ago
Data profiling is about analyzing the structure and content of data, not about changing the presentation layer. I think the answer is A, pseudonymization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
9 months ago
This question is making me thirsty. Can we get some fuel for the brain instead of the pumps?
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. We need to deploy the FortiSIEM on the corporate network to keep an eye on those temperature fluctuations. Simple enough, right?
upvoted 0 times
Callie
8 months ago
Agreed, it's important to have multiple layers of protection in place for the fuel pumps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
8 months ago
That's a great idea! Combining both solutions will provide comprehensive monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
9 months ago
We can also use sensors on the fuel pumps to monitor temperature changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
9 months ago
Yes, deploying FortiSIEM on the corporate network is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Letha
9 months ago
Hold up, are we talking about monitoring fuel pumps or keeping the corporate network cool? I'm getting mixed signals here.
upvoted 0 times
Royal
8 months ago
The focus is on monitoring the fuel pumps, not keeping the corporate network cool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
8 months ago
The OT network architect can achieve this by deploying a solution that allows for close monitoring of the fuel pumps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
9 months ago
We need to monitor the fuel pumps for temperature fluctuations from the corporate network.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristel
10 months ago
Hmm, a single-pattern temperature performance rule? I hope it doesn't get too hot for the FortiSIEM to handle.
upvoted 0 times
Belen
9 months ago
User 3: I think setting up a secure VPN connection between the corporate network and the fuel pumps could help with monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
9 months ago
User 2: They could also consider implementing a firewall to protect the fuel pumps from cyber threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
9 months ago
User 1: Maybe they can use a combination of sensors and alarms to monitor the temperature.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aileen
10 months ago
Wait, so I have to configure a fuel server? I thought this was an OT network, not a gas station!
upvoted 0 times
Jamal
9 months ago
Yes, the fuel server helps monitor temperature fluctuations for the fuel pumps in the industrial remote network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
9 months ago
C) Configure a fuel server on the remote network, and deploy a FortiSIEM with a single pattern temperature performance rule on the corporate network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
10 months ago
A) Configure a fuel server on the remote network, and deploy a FortiSIEM with a single pattern temperature security rule on the corporate network.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leanna
10 months ago
I see both points, but I think option D might be the most efficient by configuring both on the corporate network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is better as it configures the fuel server on the remote network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
11 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it deploys the solution on the corporate network.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel