New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet NSE6_FSW-7.2 Exam - Topic 4 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FSW-7.2 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 4
[All NSE6_FSW-7.2 Questions]

Exhibit.

Two routes are not installed in the forwarding information base (FIB) as shown in the exnibit. Which two statements about these two route entries are true? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Kasandra at Jun 03, 2024, 10:14 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE6_FSW-7.2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Leigha
3 months ago
B is spot on, they'll take over if the best routes go down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about A? That seems off!
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
3 months ago
D is definitely not true, they aren't in the FIB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
4 months ago
I disagree, C makes sense for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
4 months ago
A and B are correct! Higher admin distance means they're not used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
4 months ago
I don’t think those routes would be used for load balancing. I feel like C is definitely not right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
4 months ago
I’m uncertain if those routes can become primary if the best ones are removed. That seems a bit tricky to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where routes were not installed due to administrative distance. It feels like A could be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
5 months ago
I think the routes not in the FIB might have a higher administrative distance, but I'm not completely sure about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
5 months ago
Alright, let's do this. I'm feeling pretty confident about this type of question. I'll carefully review the exhibit and the answer choices, and then select the two that best match the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
5 months ago
I think I've got a strategy for this. The key is to focus on the fact that these two routes are not installed in the FIB. That means they're likely backup or secondary routes, so I'll need to think about how that might affect their administrative distance, priority, and usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The exhibit doesn't provide a lot of context, so I'll have to make some educated guesses. I'll start by considering each answer choice and see if I can eliminate any that don't seem plausible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking about two routes that are not installed in the forwarding information base (FIB). I'll need to think about what that means and how it might relate to the answer choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the exhibit and the answer choices to determine which two statements are true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
5 months ago
I've worked with authentication for REST services before, so I think I've got a good handle on this. Based on the options provided, the correct answer is to insert the service's endpoint in a .properties file. That's a common way to manage configuration settings for a web service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the load balancing requirements across the routed paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
5 months ago
Ugh, I'm drawing a blank on the RSVP-TE defaults for this router. I guess I'll have to make an educated guess based on the information provided in the question. Hopefully, I can at least eliminate a couple of the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The passage talks about having to configure a lot of widgets, but then it also says you don't need to create everything from scratch. I'm not sure if that means the Scaffold class is required or just an optional tool. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
2 years ago
Wait, so these routes are just chilling in the hardware table, but not actually being used? Talk about wasted resources! Someone call the router police!
upvoted 0 times
Anastacia
2 years ago
I know, it's like they're just taking up space for no reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
2 years ago
Yeah, it's strange that they're just sitting there unused.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Regenia
2 years ago
I agree with A and D. These routes are probably just backup options in case the main routes go down. Gotta have those redundancies, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Terrilyn
2 years ago
Definitely, you never know when the main routes might fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
2 years ago
Yeah, having backup routes is always a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Slyvia
2 years ago
B is definitely wrong, since these routes are not the primary ones. And C doesn't make sense either, since load-balancing requires equal-cost routes.
upvoted 0 times
Paris
2 years ago
D) These two routes are available in the hardware routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
2 years ago
A) These two routes have a higher administrative distance value available to the destination networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gearldine
2 years ago
Haha, looks like someone forgot to configure the routing table properly. This is why I always double-check my work!
upvoted 0 times
Shenika
2 years ago
Aleta: I wonder if those routes will ever be used for load-balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
2 years ago
Definitely, mistakes can happen easily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
2 years ago
Yeah, double-checking is always a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annice
2 years ago
I think the answer is A and D. The two routes not installed in the FIB must have a higher admin distance and be available in the hardware routing table, but not used for forwarding.
upvoted 0 times
Rosalyn
2 years ago
Yes, and they should also be available in the hardware routing table but not used for forwarding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
2 years ago
I agree, the routes must have a higher admin distance to not be installed in the FIB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
2 years ago
Yes, and they should also be available in the hardware routing table but not used for forwarding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
2 years ago
That makes sense. They are not used for forwarding but still available.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
2 years ago
Yes, you are correct. Those routes must have a higher admin distance and be in the hardware routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
2 years ago
I agree, the routes must have a higher admin distance to not be installed in the FIB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
2 years ago
I think the answer is A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Junita
2 years ago
I agree with you, Stefany. The routes with higher administrative distance are usually preferred.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
2 years ago
I think the correct answers are A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel