New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet NSE6_FSW-7.2 Exam - Topic 4 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FSW-7.2 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 4
[All NSE6_FSW-7.2 Questions]

Exhibit.

LAG and MCLAG are used to increase the available network bandwidth and enable redundancy. How does spanning tree protocol see MCLAG and LAG if they are configured based on the physi-cal view shown in the exhibit? (Choose two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Valene
3 months ago
MCLAG is tricky, but I think it’s all about redundancy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
3 months ago
B is a good point, but I think C is off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
3 months ago
Wait, how can Switch 1 and 2 be seen as one?
upvoted 0 times
...
My
4 months ago
Totally agree with A, makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
4 months ago
A and D are correct!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
4 months ago
If I recall correctly, Switch 1 and Switch 2 should be seen as one switch by spanning tree, but I'm a bit confused about the specifics of MCLAG.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marla
4 months ago
I feel like Switch 3 and Switch 4 might be seen as a single interface, but I can't quite remember if that's correct in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
4 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where MCLAG was involved, and I recall that Switch 1 and Switch 2 are treated as a single entity in some scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
5 months ago
I remember studying how MCLAG allows for redundancy, but I'm not entirely sure how spanning tree views the switches in this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
5 months ago
Alright, I've got a strategy here. I'll start by identifying the MCLAG and LAG components in the exhibit, then consider how spanning tree would view those logical groupings versus the individual physical links. That should help me narrow down the correct answer choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm a bit confused about how the spanning tree protocol handles MCLAG and LAG setups. I'll need to review my notes and try to reason through the different options presented in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
5 months ago
I think the key here is to remember that spanning tree operates on the logical topology, not just the physical connections. So I need to think about how the MCLAG and LAG configurations would be seen by spanning tree.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
5 months ago
Okay, let me take a closer look at the exhibit. It looks like there are multiple switches connected via MCLAG and LAG. I'll need to consider how spanning tree would interpret these logical groupings versus the physical connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
5 months ago
Hmm, this question seems to be testing my understanding of how spanning tree protocol handles MCLAG and LAG configurations. I'll need to carefully analyze the physical topology shown in the exhibit and think through how the spanning tree would view the different switch connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
10 months ago
Wow, this question is a real brain teaser! I feel like I'm playing Tetris with network protocols. But hey, at least it's not a trick question, right? *wink*
upvoted 0 times
Vallie
8 months ago
True, it's important to grasp the concept to choose the correct options for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
9 months ago
I think the key is to remember how STP views the physical connections in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
9 months ago
I agree, it's all about understanding how the configurations impact the network topology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
10 months ago
Definitely a brain teaser! It's like a puzzle trying to figure out how STP sees MCLAG and LAG.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruthann
10 months ago
Aha! I got it. A, B, and C are the answers. MCLAG groups the switches, LAG combines the uplinks, and the MCLAG client is seen as a single switch. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
10 months ago
Hmm, D doesn't sound right. Switch 1 and Switch 2 are separate switches, even if they're part of an MCLAG. Spanning tree should see them as individual devices.
upvoted 0 times
Margart
9 months ago
B) Switch 3 and Switch 4 uplinks are treated as single interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
10 months ago
A) Switch 1, Switch 2, and Switch 3 are seen as one MCLAG peer group
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Veronique
11 months ago
I think C is also correct. Since Switch 3 and Switch 4 are part of the MCLAG, they would be seen as a single switch client by spanning tree.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
11 months ago
A and B seem like the correct answers. MCLAG groups the switches together, and LAG treats the uplinks as a single interface. Spanning tree would see the topology as a single logical switch.
upvoted 0 times
Jackie
9 months ago
Spanning tree would see the topology as a single logical switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
10 months ago
MCLAG groups the switches together, and LAG treats the uplinks as a single interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
10 months ago
I agree, A and B are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerald
11 months ago
I'm not sure about the answer, but I think B) Switch 3 and Switch 4 uplinks are treated as single interfaces could also be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julian
11 months ago
I agree with Kenneth, but I also think the answer could be C) Switch 3 and Switch 4 are seen as one MCLAG switch client.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) Switch 1, Switch 2, and Switch 3 are seen as one MCLAG peer group.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel