New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet NSE6_FSW-7.2 Exam - Topic 4 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FSW-7.2 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 4
[All NSE6_FSW-7.2 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Core-1 and Access-1 are managed and authorized by FortiGate-1. which uses port4 as the FortiLink interface. After FortiGate authorizes and manages Core-2. Port1 status becomes STP discarding.

Why is port1 in the discarding state?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Daniel
3 months ago
Not sure about that, seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
3 months ago
I think it's A, just management traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
3 months ago
Wait, is Access-1 really the root bridge?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
4 months ago
Definitely B, no MCLAG means issues!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
4 months ago
Port1 is discarding due to STP rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
4 months ago
I recall that Core-2 having the lowest bridge priority could influence its port status, but I'm not confident if that's the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
4 months ago
I feel like I might be mixing things up, but could it be that port1 is only discarding management traffic? I need to double-check that concept.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about root bridges and how they can only have one root port. Maybe that's why Access-1 is affecting port1?
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
5 months ago
I think port1 is in the discarding state because Core-1 and Core-2 might not have MCLAG configured. That sounds familiar from our practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
5 months ago
I think I've got a strategy here. The key is to understand the relationship between the devices and the Spanning Tree Protocol configuration. If I can identify the root bridge and the port roles, that should help me determine why port1 on Core-2 is in the discarding state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the details here. The question mentions MCLAG and root bridge, but I'm not sure how those concepts apply in this scenario. I'll need to review my notes on Spanning Tree Protocol and network redundancy to approach this effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question mentions that Core-1 and Access-1 are managed by FortiGate-1, and that port4 is the FortiLink interface. I'll need to think about how that might be related to the port1 issue on Core-2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the information provided in the exhibit and question to determine the root cause of the port1 discarding state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
5 months ago
I'm feeling confident about this one. The answer is option E - users that have the Write role(s) AND match the Can write user criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elina
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this; I think the preview feature is supported, but I'm not certain if browsing is limited.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
9 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? Maybe the port is discarding because the admin forgot to enable Fortinet's secret magic mode.
upvoted 0 times
Lynelle
8 months ago
D) Core-2 has the lowest bridge priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
8 months ago
C) Access-1 is the root bridge and can only have one root port.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
8 months ago
B) Core-1 and Core-2 do not have MCLAG configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
9 months ago
A) port1 on Core-2 is discarding only management traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chara
10 months ago
Option D sounds good to me. If Core-2 has the lowest bridge priority, then it should be the root bridge, and port1 would be in a discarding state.
upvoted 0 times
Sanjuana
9 months ago
User 3: So, the reason port1 is in the discarding state is because Core-2 has the lowest bridge priority. Got it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
9 months ago
User 2: That makes sense. If Core-2 is the root bridge, then port1 would be in a discarding state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
10 months ago
User 1: I think option D is correct. If Core-2 has the lowest bridge priority, it should be the root bridge.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaquana
10 months ago
Haha, looks like someone forgot to configure their MCLAG! I bet the network admin is scratching their head on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Dortha
9 months ago
User 4: Lesson learned for next time!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ramonita
9 months ago
User 3: It's important to ensure all devices are properly configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
9 months ago
User 2: Maybe they should double-check their configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
9 months ago
User 1: Yeah, that's a rookie mistake.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Selma
10 months ago
I'm not convinced. If Access-1 is the root bridge, then port1 on Core-2 should be the root port, not in a discarding state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
10 months ago
Option B seems logical. If Core-1 and Core-2 don't have MCLAG, then they can't form a redundant uplink and port1 on Core-2 will be in a discarding state.
upvoted 0 times
Barb
9 months ago
User 2: That makes sense. Without redundancy, port1 on Core-2 would be in a discarding state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irene
9 months ago
User 1: I think option B is correct. Without MCLAG, Core-1 and Core-2 can't form a redundant uplink.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micaela
10 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. Maybe we should review the exhibit again to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Core-2 has the lowest bridge priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) port1 on Core-2 is discarding only management traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel