New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet NSE6_FSW-7.2 Exam - Topic 2 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FSW-7.2 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 2
[All NSE6_FSW-7.2 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

The profile shown in the exhibit is assigned to a group of managed FortiSwitch ports, and these ports are connected to endpoints which are powered by PoE.

Which configuration action can you perform on the LLDP profile to cause these endpoints to exchange PoE information and negotiate power with the managed FortiSwitch?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Emmanuel
3 months ago
LLDP-MED is essential for PoE, no doubt about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
3 months ago
Wait, can you really negotiate power like that? Sounds complicated!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
3 months ago
I think assigning a new LLDP profile could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
4 months ago
Totally agree, option D is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
4 months ago
You need to add power management in LLDP-MED TLVs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
4 months ago
I think defining an LLDP-MED location ID was mentioned in our notes, but I'm not convinced it directly affects power negotiation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
4 months ago
I feel like creating a new LLDP-MED application type could be the answer, but it seems a bit too specific for just exchanging PoE info.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to configure LLDP profiles, but I can't recall if adding power management was the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
5 months ago
I think we discussed LLDP-MED in class, but I'm not sure which option specifically relates to PoE negotiation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
5 months ago
This is a good question. I think the key is to focus on the LLDP-MED functionality and how it relates to PoE. Option D seems like the most direct way to enable the PoE negotiation based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the technical details here. Can the LLDP-MED profile really be used to configure PoE settings? I'll need to double-check the documentation to make sure I understand this properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking about a specific configuration action, but the options seem a bit broad. I'll need to carefully read through each one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward LLDP-MED question. I think the key is to look for the option that specifically mentions configuring PoE parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The answer is option D - we need to add power management as part of the LLDP-MED TLVs to enable the PoE negotiation between the endpoints and the FortiSwitch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
9 months ago
Ah, the joys of networking jargon. Maybe we should just ask the FortiSwitch nicely to share its power?
upvoted 0 times
Thaddeus
8 months ago
D) Add power management as part of LLDP-MED TLVs to advertise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
8 months ago
C) Define an LLDP-MED location ID to use standard protocols for power.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
8 months ago
B) Assign a new LLDP profile to handle different LLDP-MED TLVs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
9 months ago
A) Create new a LLDP-MED application type to define the PoE parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willie
10 months ago
D is the answer, no doubt. Now, if only I could remember what LLDP-MED stands for...
upvoted 0 times
Kizzy
8 months ago
Yes, LLDP-MED helps with power negotiation. It's crucial for managing PoE devices efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
8 months ago
LLDP-MED is used for endpoint devices to negotiate power over Ethernet. It's important for PoE devices connected to FortiSwitch ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
9 months ago
I think D is the correct answer too. LLDP-MED stands for Link Layer Discovery Protocol-Media Endpoint Discovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roselle
10 months ago
Hmm, all these acronyms are making my head spin. Can we just call it the 'Snazzy Power Negotiation' feature?
upvoted 0 times
Jennifer
8 months ago
C) Define an LLDP-MED location ID to use standard protocols for power.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
9 months ago
B) Assign a new LLDP profile to handle different LLDP-MED TLVs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
10 months ago
A) Create new a LLDP-MED application type to define the PoE parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annette
10 months ago
I agree, D is the way to go. Gotta love LLDP-MED and those tasty TLVs!
upvoted 0 times
Arleen
8 months ago
User 4: Agreed, D is the way to make sure the endpoints negotiate power properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
8 months ago
User 3: LLDP-MED and those TLVs are definitely helpful for exchanging PoE information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, adding power management as part of LLDP-MED TLVs is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
9 months ago
User 1: I think D is the best option for negotiating power with the managed FortiSwitch.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gilma
10 months ago
Answer D is the correct one. Adding power management TLVs to LLDP-MED will allow the endpoints to negotiate power requirements with the FortiSwitch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
10 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. Let's see what others think before the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Add power management as part of LLDP-MED TLVs to advertise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) Create new a LLDP-MED application type to define the PoE parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel