Fortinet Exam NSE6_FSW-7.2 Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FSW-7.2 exam

Question #: 11
Topic #: 1

Refer to the exhibit.

The profile shown in the exhibit is assigned to a group of managed FortiSwitch ports. and these ports are connected to endpoints which are powered by PoE. Which configuration action can you perform on the LLDP profile to cause these endpoints to exchange PoE information and negotiate power with the managed

FortiSwitch?

AAssign a new LL0P profile to handle different LLDP-ME0 TLVs

BAdd power management as part of LLDP-MED TLVs to advertise.

CDefine an LLDP-ME0 location 10 to use standard protocols for power.

DCreate new a LLOP-MEO application type to define the PoE parameters.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Scot at Jul 05, 2024, 08:30 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE6_FSW-7.2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Paulina

10 months ago

Power management as part of LLDP-MED TLVs? Sounds like a no-brainer to me. D all the way!

upvoted 0 times

...

Dustin

11 months ago

Haha, I bet the exam writer had a field day coming up with these options. D is the way to go, no doubt about it.

upvoted 0 times

Filiberto

9 months ago

It's important for the endpoints to exchange PoE information and negotiate power.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stacey

10 months ago

Yeah, adding power management as part of LLDP-MED TLVs is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamie

10 months ago

I agree, D is definitely the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Whitley

10 months ago

Definitely, D seems like the most logical choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brynn

10 months ago

Yeah, I agree. Adding power management as part of LLDP-MED TLVs is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meghan

10 months ago

I think D is the best option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharen

11 months ago

Option B looks interesting, but I'm not sure if assigning a new LLDP profile is necessary just to handle different LLDP-MED TLVs. D seems like the most straightforward choice here.

upvoted 0 times

Linwood

10 months ago

Yeah, D seems like the most efficient choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashley

10 months ago

I think D is the best option too. It directly adds power management to advertise.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

11 months ago

Hmm, that makes sense too. It's important to advertise power management information for negotiation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helga

11 months ago

I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Add power management as part of LLDP-MED TLVs to advertise.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janessa

11 months ago

I think the correct answer is D. Adding power management as part of LLDP-MED TLVs to advertise seems like the logical step to enable PoE negotiation between the endpoints and the FortiSwitch.

upvoted 0 times

Marsha

10 months ago

I agree, adding power management as part of LLDP-MED TLVs to advertise makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yun

11 months ago

I think the correct answer is D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

11 months ago

I think the answer is A) Create new a LLDP-MED application type to define the PoE parameters.

upvoted 0 times

...